-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 11/11/2014 10:47 AM, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:39:06 +0000, hellekin wrote: > ... >> But now I think it would be better to explain why it's not necessary, > > You need it if you want to guard against the user device accidentally > routing around the box? > *** That might actually be a feature. At least during development ;o)
> Also, auto-config of the clients without hassling > with the upstream DHCP. > *** That is a compelling argument. Zero configuration. > > No need for a switch for a single user device. > > I'm not even completely comfortable with having only one port > on my router and accessing the DSL modem via VLAN and the switch. > *** I am not aware of any (free) hardware that provides a more complex setup... If the argument was made properly, maybe Olimex would consider it... Thank you for your insight, == hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUYhdMXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ3MDM3QTJCNjlFNkMxQzA1NjI4RDUzOEZE OEU3QkQ4MDk0MUM4MjkzAAoJENjnvYCUHIKTxScQAMIe2XN41Mc+qs7t4iCgNqOD CL10pXbBK4XwrzrPJmoZG55/iSWT4pkx7568cTShMO7XJ1rGTOGam8jyxigGClKf e1Dvd/162+ehY/p0cNpyDpPFPV6YR8uO2dtxvUujdSqoDyID0STq22z7PhDTUf4l 4LB+OF4KHbByuO5kTyMjZOc9FwW6s7yW3DCFTZg7LDza3ceZzcLV4XDssCBP5+3j i+5H6xeWJf/xwNvb50jhw6YNdZUknwO9/7yhPbmMoLDSNkSnyb5XqyozcskBeSH5 GLFDw2XQb9s9hfEJtgByttCDO+IgnChduUAryw9SRuxFltDJMQeOeALryQXgFM9O o9mRGyC4Xm1+uSeTIeFrNIHgMPccpldS58BsmIRfD70LFRVIWW/77B2e8CpWRVOi Spk6WyB9LX2lc36IPJEHUZ3KXY1ClqvbYWwrH1uSDqRaqr6ipmhbzrjRwy1R+785 HrAX2yyMfnOYu3VlQa/tYv5IoxDu5j9YFCcuqbjHx9z+C4D0nTeOi+RTPVXx+yul DdPdo5/kiYAzuzDrqxwDX3+8j6Zf2OtVpYvjOYrx85CIrIZU/nfZkbQ7auGWYn69 dlgx/cMvTywkRFmGED+Euk7dwWZrDAp0AcD3ZAo8sYwt6/sNRJ3GTxnIWHs1Fqkc MZFCjR/wKFZ7ohO+v7aT =Phia -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk