> Hi, @foodforthought! I really appreciated a lot your thoughts and thank
> you sincerely for sharing your considerations. Muah! :*
Hi, thanks for reading! And thank you for sharing your very personal part
of the story. It must be very hard for you, now. I see you have have a lot
of
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/18/2016 04:09 PM, foodforthou...@sigaint.org wrote:
>>
Things are never black and white, there are always two sides of
a story and people are never only good or bad.
But was it really our first and foremost concern to f
>> -) What is not criminal can still be harmful, disrespectful, humiliating
>> or
>> violating consent, just as what is criminal can still be ethical or
>> consensual. Innocent until found guilty misses the mark in this context.
>
> "Innocent until proven guilty" doesn't have to apply only to court
>> Things are never black and white, there are always two sides of a story
>> and people are never only good or bad.
>>
>> But was it really our first and foremost concern to find out the
>> "truth"?
>> Is the lesson to be learned, if you will, about who is to blame? About
>> shaming the victims o
Things are never black and white, there are always two sides of a story
and people are never only good or bad.
But was it really our first and foremost concern to find out the "truth"?
Is the lesson to be learned, if you will, about who is to blame? About
shaming the victims or shaming the alleged
