Is it possible to have Thunderbird choose a different path for each account?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Andrew Lewman:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 09:07:02AM +, antispa...@sent.at wrote 2.2K bytes
> in 0 lines about:
> : A self-signed certificate is better than no certificate. Given the
> : trouble with a CA, it might be just as good as a CA certificate.
>
> Perhaps a better complaint for Mozilla
Georg Koppen:
> antispa...@sent.at:
>> Could Tor Browser kill or minimize the warning triggered by entering a
>> site with a self signed certificate?
> Killing is not a good idea. What do you mean with "minimize"?
A self-signed certificate is better than no certificate. Given the
trouble with a CA
could be pidgin be made to tell about other accounts it knows? or about
other accounts used at the same time?
how can i make pidgin use different tor circuits for each account?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.tor
Lately I have watched a few video speeches about security. The most
interesting was one by Poul Henning Kamp[1]. The idea is that self
signed certificates have a problem, but the cascade of curses brought up
by such a certificate in any browser is an excess.
Could Tor Browser kill or minimize the
damian.da...@openmailbox.org:
> Many XMPP servers allow registration over Tor.
>
> Few XMPP servers are run as hidden services.
> https://xmpp.net/reports.php#onions
>
> Austici is not on that list yet I think.
>
> If the link is useful please post it at tor-talk.
>
> DDamian
>
It is very use
In his announcement, arma noted it would be a good idea to stay away
from the Internet. Is it ok?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
I have been searching about XMPP and Tor. And I don't seem to reach
lists, only hints.
Do you know somebody compiling such a list? Hidden services are better,
but as long as they are tor friendly should be fine.
So far I know autistici and riseup do have .onions. And that
openmailbox.org does run
I downloaded the right archive and overwrote the existing folder
(3.5.3). Restarted and the yellow triangle is still there. On the upper
right corner it's written 3.5.4, yet the welcome page says:
> HOWEVER, this browser is out of date.
Am I doing something wrong?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-
Mike Perry:
>> Many people use TOR or secure ways to chat on smartphones.
>>
>> The last months have reveiled how hard secret services attack our phones.
>>
>> This leads me to the question, how secure are our smartphones at all?
>
> Not very, or not at all, depending on your threat model.
That m
Ed Fletcher:
> This is something that I have also wondered about. Why go outside of
> the Tor network to check that you're using Tor? Access to any hidden
> service would be proof positive that you are connected.
Because most people care about the clearnet. Because tor services are
not accessibl
I jumped so fast onto NoScript and other tools that I completely ignored
the options that are already there, somewhere. Sure, NoScript has some
wonderful extra features beyond JS blocking. It even has the
functionality of RequestPolicy and a lot more, but in a very unfriendly way.
How about Page I
Jacob Appelbaum:
> We have a new TorBirdy logo. Thanks to Nima Fatemi!
It looks great!
> Improved documentation:
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/torbirdy
I've just checked it. The download link still gives 0.1.1.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
T
On 01.11.2013 12:08, Mix+TB Test wrote:
Running TB 24.1.0 with TorBirdy 0.1.1 under Linux. No issues. Default
settings, no other extensions.
It's on Windows that things happen like that. And it's strange as the
Network clearly shows the good settings.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists
On 01.11.2013 03:38, Sukhbir Singh wrote:
Till that time, your best bet is to use Thunderbird 17. In fact, it
would be great if you can try it with TB 17 just to confirm that the
issue doesn't lie elsewhere.
Thank you Sukhbir! You nailed it the first time. Thunderbird 17.0.10
does not generate
On 01.11.2013 03:38, Sukhbir Singh wrote:
Which version of Thunderbird are you using? If it is Thunderbird 24,
TorBirdy 0.1.1. is not compatible with it. We will be releasing a new
version in the coming week that adds support for Thunderbird 24.
It's even 24.1.0! And it makes perfect sense. But
I downloaded TorBirdy 0.1.1. Than I installed clean Thunderbird from
PortableApps.com. Made sure nothing is called or installed before
TorBirdy. Than I have set up my account. A few of them actually. Than I
installed some extra extensions. TorBirdy is not used for
life–theatening situations.
On 31.10.2013 19:38, Lars Noodén wrote:
On 10/31/2013 09:07 PM, antispa...@sent.at wrote:
AFAIK you don't need permission for creating a mirror. After all,
the works are in the Public Domain.
The original works are in the public domain, but the new, electronic
editions may not be. But either w
On 31.10.2013 17:53, Manfred Ackermann wrote:
I just did it without asking for permission ;-) Same result ... it still
comes out of a Tor IP.
AFAIK you don't need permission for creating a mirror. After all, the
works are in the Public Domain.
If someone can offer a STunnel or Proxy on a No
On 31.10.2013 13:19, krishna e bera wrote:
Would Project Gutenberg accept a Hidden Service mirror site?
Can you do it?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On 30.10.2013 19:14, Georg Koppen wrote:
Works for me.
The relevant line was:
Don't use anonymizers, open proxies, VPNs, or TOR to access
Project Gutenberg.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi
Maybe you all know that, but it came as a shock to me. I'm quite sure a
few months ago it used to work. Not well, some of the exits were
blocked. But anyway:
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/search/
Error 403
To fix this error:
Don't use anonymizers, open proxies, VPNs, or TOR to access P
On 29.10.2013 13:39, krishna e bera wrote:
However Tor exists in a world where that isnt enough, and
indeed relies on countries and users with (often) opposing interests for
its marketing and anonymity model.
There is no other world. Weaseling around does not help. It never
helped. Take the ex
That's a wonderful example why people need qualifications before
starting into philosophy, just like with security, painting or roof
fixing.
Porn is a disgusting shortcut. Sex is wonderful. Sex is beautiful. And
that beauty and that pleasure interfers with the total obeisance
required by the major
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012, at 21:33, Outlaw wrote:
> Hey there, Tor devs :) IMHO present torproject.org is very difficult
> for average internet user. For those who don`t know english well, it
> is almost impossible to find proper link.
But how in the World are they going to know how to secure their
Sorry for the delay in answering. I overlooked the message.
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012, at 01:09, tagnaq wrote:
> > Sukhbir, could you make a small tutorial on how to test TorBirdy?
> > I'm willing to create one or two free accounts via TBB and do the
> > checking, but I have no idea how.
>
> thanks f
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012, at 14:02, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> Bry8 Star:
> > i'm not 100% sure, if Portable Thunderbird would work under Wine or not,
> > but worth a shot.
> > Many windows Portable apps, does run using Wine.
> > And what about loading a small custom Windows XP inside a VirtualBox
> > bas
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012, at 14:46, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 14:21:39 +, antispa...@sent.at wrote:
> ...
> > with Pidgin through Tor. In my proxy configuration for the account in
> > Pidgin I left the user and password empty. And it still worked. Am I
> > missing something? Shouldn'
Vidalia -> Settings -> Advanced
TCP Connection. Normally it goes on auto. But I guess it can be set for
each instance. Now the ControlSocket would do exactly the same in an
Unix environment for an app that can use a special file?
Second: authentication. It is set for password. And the password is
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012, at 08:06, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> Depending on the version of TBB you have, Tor will randomly select the
> SOCKS5 port it listens on. I don't know of official documentation off
> hand, but I know there are a couple ways to find it. It is specified in
> Data/Tor/port.conf within
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012, at 08:11, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 09:31:57PM +0200, antispa...@sent.at wrote:
> > I have in a folder on a 64bit Linux distro the TBB. I read the Vidalia
> > bundle has been discontinued. So I jumped at using this configuration.
> > I have read that the
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012, at 18:27, adrelanos wrote:
> The official bug tracker is better for requests. I've submitted such a
> request a while ago. [1] [2] [3] Nothing wrong repeating this one the
> mailing list, maybe more people read it so we get more input.
The bug tracker might or should be better
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012, at 17:52, Tom Ritter wrote:
> On 5 October 2012 11:37, wrote:
> > This is a request. Would someone be so kind as to add a tutorial, in
> > fact, several tutorials for how to test/see if an app is Tor ready?
>
>
> There's some wiki articles, but I'm surprised there wasn't a
I have in a folder on a 64bit Linux distro the TBB. I read the Vidalia
bundle has been discontinued. So I jumped at using this configuration.
I have read that the socks 5 proxy is on 127.0.0.1:9050. So I tried
pushing through it a jabber.org connection (XMPP) with Pidgin. Pidgin
even lists Socks 4,
This is a request. Would someone be so kind as to add a tutorial, in
fact, several tutorials for how to test/see if an app is Tor ready?
Cheers!
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012, at 04:18, Sukhbir Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> antispa...@sent.at:
> >> Also, please use 0.0.13 and not 0.0.11, there are many important bug
> >> fixes. 0.0.13 will be available from Mozilla add-ons soon (we have
> >> submitted it for review) [2].
> >
> > Sukhbir, could you make a
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012, at 21:02, Sukhbir Singh wrote:
> Is TorBirdy completely safe? Not yet, but we are getting there! Is it
> safer than manually configuring Thunderbird (or other mail clients) for
> use with Tor? Definitely yes. I think you should give TorBirdy a try and
> see if it matches up to
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012, at 16:27, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> antispa...@sent.at:
> > It's not very clear to me. The Date and Message-ID would leak the
> > computer timezone. Are there other issues with 0.11 available on
> > mozilla addons?
>
> We suggest using 0.0.13 - we've fixed a lot of bugs. It is p
It's not very clear to me. The Date and Message-ID would leak the
computer timezone. Are there other issues with 0.11 available on
mozilla addons?
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012, at 15:53, Karsten N. wrote:
> On 09/30/2012 02:49 PM, antispa...@sent.at wrote:
> > What about Linux?
>
> You may download Thunderbird for Linux (i686 or x86_64) from:
>
> http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/releases/latest/
>
> to your USB-Stick, unpack
I see TorBirdy is readily available. But that might mean a system wide
instance of Thunderbird. For Windows the solution is just a clean
version of Thunderbird provided by PortableApps.com and TorBirdy, maybe
downloaded via Tor/TBB. What about Linux? I could not find the
equivalent PortableApps.Lin
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012, at 14:26, and...@torproject.is wrote:
> Likely, the update checks just occur through Tor. I haven't investigated
> personas on tbb. My approach would be to open the web console and watch
> for all requests from an idle tbb.
I don't care about updates. It's about if a site can
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012, at 13:06, and...@torproject.is wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:35:13AM +0200, antispa...@sent.at wrote 1.1K
> bytes in 23 lines about:
> : I forgot to answer that: have more desktops. And do not click on hide.
> : That way each instance is clearly separated.
>
> This depe
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012, at 13:06, esolve esolve wrote:
> I'm just wondering how can the website know your ISP or location?
One way is just to interrogate some tables. That points out the ISP for
sure, but the qality of the location is variable.
Another way is to use the information provided by your
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012, at 15:13, adrelanos wrote:
> Jerzy Łogiewa:
> > How dangerous are the DNS leak for some user?
>
> Very dangerous!
>
> http://www.howdoihidemyip.com/dnsleak.htm
> "The DNS leak provides your ISP name and location to the website that
> you are visiting, thus undermining your a
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012, at 14:11, and...@torproject.is wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:03:48PM +0200, antispa...@sent.at wrote 0.5K
> bytes in 12 lines about:
> : This is a silly idea. But how about it? Can I tweak the pack somehow so
> : I get two TorBrowser windows working independent of one an
I keep reading on the .onion forums about the trafic and the dislike
for some *other* communities.
But, on the other hand the key to that privacy is to have more trafic.
If all guys in States do their porn shopping on clearnet and all the
guys in Iran do get their porn thorugh Tor, that could lead
Chat would always mean less than anonymous. It puts you online in a
particular time frame. And you do have to have a user.
Yet, can it be done? So far, I gather the best option would be XMPP,
TLS and OTR. That would include people having Gmail accounts too. And
in some future, who knows, maybe Fac
This is a silly idea. But how about it? Can I tweak the pack somehow so
I get two TorBrowser windows working independent of one another? Do I
need two Vidalias too? The idea would be to have my regular web
connection and one obvious ID, than running TBB as Johnny Nobody
himself, and a third instanc
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012, at 00:21, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
> It would facilitate the inclusion of Tor in third party applications
> that include/bundle/redistribute Tor, regardless of the Linux
> Distribution.
Sounds like a potential risk, the third party intervention. See the
discussion abou
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012, at 01:56, Mansour Moufid wrote:
> Anyway, I think cryptography will depend more and more on steganography
> -- and in the case of Tor, covert/subliminal channels. Imagine a protocol
> where Alice sends Bob a steady stream of garbage, and the message is
> encoded in the inter-pa
How about Nobody's (distribution)?
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Going to Bugmenot I was welcomed by a spam page. On a closer inspection
I was warned I should have cookies enabled and answer a captcha. Of
course, the „advanced details and evidence” does not work „Sorry, there
was an error”. Is this a new way of pushing advertisments down the
user's throats witho
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012, at 20:11, A. Megas wrote:
> My turn.
Cool! We're having a contest!
> You're insinuating that some dark conspiracy is at work with Dooble.
> Dooble
This is a Straw Man Fallacy. Check it out on the web, although you might
be using it on purpose. I was not insinuating. I was
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012, at 03:21, A. Megas wrote:
> As for leaking IP information, we work with a framework (Qt) that has
> issues and limitations. Every release of Dooble includes detailed
> information covering all of the fixes and improvements.
>
> Thanks.
So the package is unfit. As most people
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012, at 01:50, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> I mostly ignored this thread because I didn't think it was a big deal.
> I figured the name of your new web browser would most likely confuse
> people, but that could easily be changed once enough people convinced
> you of that. But then I act
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012, at 22:09, Randolph D. wrote:
> the domain exists for years, it has been acquired for the Qt update, see
> the given 2010 release with still firefox.
> As there it TBB, Tor Browser Bundle, the TorBrowser should not affect
> this.
Than why do you advertise it here if pushing th
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012, at 23:11, Mike Perry wrote:
> Thus spake antispa...@sent.at (antispa...@sent.at):
> > The non technical, non freak population doesn't really see the use in
> > the developed World as Facebook marketing is way past advertisments and
> > into the actual news. Just the other day
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012, at 00:14, Mike Perry wrote:
> .onion is another thing that is tragically failing to reach its
> potential because no one tries to make it useful for normal stuff. I
> rather intensely dislike the way it is being used now, but I also know
> that good use cases exist, and amazin
Sorry for the rant.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012, at 23:47, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> Anyone who installs Tor (or I2P, for that matter) and explores the
> hidden services, immediately sees the overwhelmingly illegal (mostly,
> since it depends on jurisdiction) content. Anyone who runs an exit
> node immediat
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012, at 04:27, morristan wrote:
> Silk Road reported to make $1.9 million per month,
> http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/08/06/black-market-drug-site-silk-road-booming-22-million-in-annual-mostly-illegal-sales/
>
> Tor Project reported to make $1.3 million per year,
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012, at 06:15, dumbnewbie wrote:
> In my country it's difficult (but not impossible!) to obtain "throw
> away" SIM cards due to industry regulations that require telcos and
> retailers to obtain proof of ID at the point of sale and registration
> of SIM cards. AFAIK, this proof of
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012, at 16:31, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> Thanks for all replies. I'm responding to antispam06's reply, only
> because it was last of several. Because the issue is more complex than
> I thought, GMX is no longer the sole focus. Overall, the info should
> b
m all mentioned services
(Gmail, Yahoo, Gmx) and everything was done over Tor.
> Why would Yahoo allow using Tor? Or, is it that the acct was NOT
> created using Tor, but later accessing it via Tor - * as antispam06
> mentioned * ? (not sure exactly what he meant) What would that
&g
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012, at 04:17, grarpamp wrote:
> > Riseup has been recommend by (imho) trustworthy and honest people.
> I'm happy with other comon non-gmail free providers. RiseUp
> is cool/important so I'd not use them unless I had to and could
> donate.
I had the same feeling when I first heard
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012, at 21:01, adrelanos wrote:
> Joe Btfsplk:
> > I'm not married to idea of using GMX & Tor. So if others have
> > suggestions for free email service that works w/ Tor or is actually
> > reasonably anonymous (I'm not trying to outwit NSA, here), I could go
> > that route vs beati
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012, at 03:48, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> A lot of sites & services don't like Tor users because they can't tell
> if you like privacy / anonymity or are up to no good. I guess GMX has
> caught up w/ Gmail & others, making it hard to create accts using Tor.
I see this cliché repeated
> Have you looked at mesh net and similar technologies and groups? Off the
> top of my head, I'd recommend looking into CJDNS/hyperboria, I2P,
> FreedomBox, Telecomix, Freenet, GNUnet.
Do you mean Project Meshnet or Mesh networking? As Mesh.net is a redneck
and his dada doing ISP in the land of No
Do keep in mind those are the services that should be avoided. It's crap
the thing about „anti account hijacking”. That excuse it's pretty much
the same as for child pornography when it comes to servers or terrorism
when it comes to blocking banking accounts. Gmail has a problem with it.
Yahoo has
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012, at 13:14, proper wrote:
> Must be a "quite modern" system. Sorry, I can't go into detail, I
> haven't made a comprehensive benchmark with various machines.
>
> If hardware supports virtualization, i.e. the CPU features AMD-V or
> VT-x, it works much better.
So it's for the b
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012, at 18:29, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> I haven't checked on crossplatform as I only do this in linux. I am
> currently playing with Virtualbox but have used VMware player (I DO know
> that VMware player is available for windows too so you could run windows
> or linux inside
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012, at 23:37, proper wrote:
> But what will never change is, the more anonymity/privacy/security you
> want, the more technical knowledge you'll need. We'll continue to
> provide loads of additional information to make it even more safe.
Could you make it as slim as possible? I c
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012, at 23:25, proper wrote:
> For people who really can't abstain from Flash / Java it's the best
> option I know of.
It does sound wonderful. But it sure needs a powerful machine. A CPU
designed for lower power consumption and thus battery maximisation can't
scale well with two
> Some are cross platform and depending on your hardware, they are also
> quite fast.
What do you mean by fast? Can they make tails responsive on a AMD E350.
The qualities of that are low power consumption and being a true dual
core.
___
tor-talk mailing
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012, at 22:14, proper wrote:
> My non-offical project supports [1] that. Java and Flash do not leak IP
> or DNS.
Even without leaking IP, they have far too much power for a far too
small benefit. The ability to write or read the disk beyond the powers
of the browser. Leaking font
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012, at 16:38, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> My main interest in emulators and/or VMs is to be able to use tor
> browser but also leave some of the add-ons activated (javascript, flash)
> and STILL defeat tracking. Tor gives you ip X and the VM provides a
> totally bogus IP addres
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012, at 18:15, proper wrote:
> antispa...@sent.at:
> > In the sense that each extension should be combed for functions that
> > interact with the non–local or that no developer has a wish to inhibit
> > extensions from chatting with the exterior?
>
> Yes, but its even more. Also s
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012, at 13:41, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> Would not cpu/system data get hidden if you ran tor browser inside an
> emulator?
Yes, an emulator with Tails. But, why should people have to do all that
and install so many packages just to fix a Hole in the browser?
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012, at 15:41, krugar wrote:
> the way the TBB creates anonymity may not be very intuitive, but it does
> work. at least as long as you do not identify yourself to a website that
> will link your voluntarily given identity to the series of throw-away
> cookies TBB leaves with track
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012, at 15:02, proper wrote:
> antispa...@sent.at:
> > I remember reading about installing more extensions as a bad
> > thing as it might identify a Tor configuration from another. But
> > can't this be hidden?
>
> Maybe. Would require development which no one wants to take.
In t
I remember reading about installing more extensions as a bad
thing as it might identify a Tor configuration from another. But
can't this be hidden? I know extensions can answer javascript
requests. Is it possible to have a generic option to stop them
from answering to these external requests?
Also,
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012, at 19:07, starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
> 1) Will the TOR bundle co-exist peacefully
> and separately with a Firefox 13 install under
> Windows (2008 SP2 x64)? Ideally I'd like for them
> to not interact at all and for the TOR instance
> of Firefox to run simultaneously to a re
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012, at 15:32, Sam Whited wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:17 PM, || ΣΖΟ || wrote:
> > So spammers abuse tor...
>
> Yes, they always have, and probably always will.
I feel there is a need to dispell some wonderful magic of the modern
society: the World has always been large. Ev
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012, at 15:38, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> When I decided to publish a large collection (30gb) of previously
> paywalled (but public domain) JSTOR documents[1] I initially planned
> to do so anonymously— simply to mitigate the risk of harassment via
> the courts. Ultimately, after more
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012, at 12:34, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
> You may even place in front of your TorHS, internet-exposed via Tor2web,
> a CloudFare.net frontend or other "cloudizer" to improve performance
> improved caches.
What is cloudfare? I tried and got pushed to some facebook page so I
c
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012, at 14:20, Edward Thompson wrote:
> 2. Email. I signed up for mailoo.org through Tor, I believe. But for all
> practical purposes, you could easily get a disposable e-mail address
> through a Firefox plugin called Bloody Vikings. Otherwise, pretty much
> any web mail will do...
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012, at 13:06, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 01:48:37AM +0200, antispa...@sent.at wrote:
> > But are there anonymous payment tools in this days of control? I just
>
> Anonymous prepaid cards, or BitCoin over Tor would come to mind.
Could you expand a little? As of
But are there anonymous payment tools in this days of control? I just
received a new batch of questions asked by my banking institution. I
must answer before a certain date or they are going to cut my access
from my money. And they can do that. The explanation is fighting
terrorism and money launde
Actually, there seem to be various issues. This was reported a couple of
days ago on the Blog
(https://blog.torproject.org/blog/new-tor-browser-bundles-19#comment-16130)
with a different message. Also check out the answers. Myself I just
checked it a few minutes ago and the result or answer was fin
89 matches
Mail list logo
