On Sat, Jul 14, 2012, at 13:14, proper wrote: > Must be a "quite modern" system. Sorry, I can't go into detail, I > haven't made a comprehensive benchmark with various machines. > > If hardware supports virtualization, i.e. the CPU features AMD-V or > VT-x, it works much better.
So it's for the big boys. But it's not the developers' fault. It should be a black eye for the protocol guys who designed only wide open standards and white papers with no regard to privacy. Otherwise, a heavy encrypted standard common for communication would have meant tablets would have been powerful enough or they wouldn't sell. > > Isn't Ubuntu a little bit too large, at least for the Gateway? > > No. > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorBOX/FAQ#WhyaretheTorBOXimagessobig Right. Signed packages and large userbase should trump the rest. Now, all I have to do is convince Ubuntu to head towards Puppy Linux and not MacOS XII. Just kidding. _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
