On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Alexandre Guillioud
wrote:
> I had heard that the original use case were to protect their (US navy)
> ships against command center localisation through RF harvesting. The onion
> routing of the admiral commands through a few boats means enemmies can't
> detect whi
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Paul Syverson
wrote:
> We came up ourselves with potential application suggestions such as
> open source intelligence gathering or "phoning home" as you put it.
> We also came up with other ideas (some good, some bad) and also talked
> to people about how it might
you dont have a wikipedia page so... thanks much...
philosophy of logic huh... so that means you would probably comprehend why
i would be desirous of exhaustive research regarding `evolution`... as you
state below ...and more, if we follow logic, why inaction is unethical of
the mindful
> > >> O
>> Looking forward to find actually hiding families
>
>
> first detected exit family that actively tries to _not_ look like
> a family (distinct contactinfo, multiple ASes)
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/tor-network-observations/master/15_exit_group_2015-05-02-15
next:
https://gi
My connect is too slow to read it all
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:01:41PM +0300, Cari Machet wrote:
> i understood you worked there i didnt understand that you worked there
> prior to onion routing research
Ah OK. Now your question makes sense to me. I started at NRL in 1989. I
started working on onion routing in 1995. I've worked on
i understood you worked there i didnt understand that you worked there
prior to onion routing research
thanks for your time in answering my question
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> On 08/03/2015 10:02 AM, Paul Syverson wrote:
> > Hi Cari,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 06:38:0
On 08/03/2015 10:02 AM, Paul Syverson wrote:
> Hi Cari,
>
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 06:38:07PM +0300, Cari Machet wrote:
>> dear paul - specifically how did YOU know how to / or that you could get
>> funding from the navy... specifically the navy that is... not just the
>> general US gov
>
> I'm
Hi Cari,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 06:38:07PM +0300, Cari Machet wrote:
> dear paul - specifically how did YOU know how to / or that you could get
> funding from the navy... specifically the navy that is... not just the
> general US gov
I'm confused. I work at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. Th
dear paul - specifically how did YOU know how to / or that you could get
funding from the navy... specifically the navy that is... not just the
general US gov
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Paul Syverson
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:58:59PM +0800, Virgil Griffith wrote:
> > > You
On 08/02/2015 11:05 PM, Juan wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300
> Cari Machet wrote:
>
>> https://youtu.be/qXajND7BQzk?t=27m40s
>>
>> here is on camera explanation of why the navy wants you to use
>> tor ... if YOU dont it wont work
>
>
> Bingo.
>
> If only the criminals f
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:58:59PM +0800, Virgil Griffith wrote:
> > You did that on purpose, right? You obviously knew the kind of
> > answers your question would generate.
>
> I was hoping for responses like those from Dr. Syverson. I was not
> interested in debating the ethics
dear virgil you are not my representative on planet fucking earth
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Cari Machet wrote:
> the very nature of parasitic behavior
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Juan wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300
>> Cari Machet wrote:
>>
>> > https://youtu.be/qXa
the very nature of parasitic behavior
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Juan wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300
> Cari Machet wrote:
>
> > https://youtu.be/qXajND7BQzk?t=27m40s
> >
> > here is on camera explanation of why the navy wants you to use
> > tor ... if YOU dont it wont work
>
>
> You did that on purpose, right? You obviously knew the kind of
> answers your question would generate.
I was hoping for responses like those from Dr. Syverson. I was not
interested in debating the ethics or justification---simply what the
original funders were looking for / wish
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:41:18 +0800
Virgil Griffith wrote:
> I delegate this thread to tor-opent...@lists.torproject.org
By the way, you started this thread here and now you want to
move it somewhere else?
You did that on purpose, right? You obviously knew the kind of
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:41:18 +0800
Virgil Griffith wrote:
> I delegate this thread to tor-opent...@lists.torproject.org
what?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Juan wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:16:43 +0300
> > Cari Machet wrote:
> >
> >> https://youtu.be/qXajND7BQzk?t
On 3 August 2015 at 08:52, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 08:50:54AM +0200, Jon Tullett wrote:
>> Looks interesting. Has anyone reviewed it?
>>
>> http://people.csail.mit.edu/devadas/pubs/circuit_finger.pdf
>> http://anongalactic.com/new-attack-on-tor-can-deanonymize-hidden-serv
18 matches
Mail list logo
