There is the implication that the tor network can be used for exactly that
with some of the side projects that are using tor. Or that using a Tails
USB stick is a little like a holy talisman against the evil NSA, when in
reality its only really suitable for accessing censored content.
On Sat, Apr
aka:
> The common user does not apply to all threat models. If you are a high
> volume recreational drug salesman, you must expect 0days and snitches.
if you're a drug salesman, you're a different type of criminal that has
high value to multiple law enforcement agencies. personally, i don't
care a
The GNS/ alternate distributed DNS thing is the bit I was specifically
referring to.
I do share your assessment that Gnunet does not provide anything like
adequate anonymity.
GnuNet's GNS could be (I assume) run across TOR or I2P - this is what
might be interesting to explore (for someone who want
Zenaan Harkness:
Something like
https://gnunet.org/taxonomy/term/34
?
You can run that now.
Hm... These from GNUnet's FAQ [0]:
Q. Is it possible to surf the WWW anonymously with GNUnet?
A. It is not possible use GNUnet for anonymous browsing at this
point. We recommend that you use Tor for a
Oh, now I get it... TorBirdy preferences > Test proxy settings sorry
> I am not sure I understand you correctly:
>> The ip check hidden behind a warning dialog hinders obtaining
>> useful data.
> Are you referring to the warning message I got?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproje
On 04/25/2015 11:20, l.m wrote:
On second thought there is an advantage to discouraging the use of the
check. If something went wrong with the socks port setting using the
check would leak the intention to use tor by connecting to
check.torproject.org. Not a big deal, unless the socks port isn't
On 04/25/2015 12:26 PM, l.m wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Lodewijk andré de la porte" wrote:
>> And just trying not to be dragnetted at all times. It's important
>> to sometimes use Tor, just so that when you actually do (one
>> day, for whatever reason!) it doesn't seem suspicious :)
>
> If you're trying to
Hi Leeroy,
> There's a strong correlation between the perceived usefulness to
> end-users and their support for a FOSS project :) A simple warning is
> easy enough.
:)
If I would like to suggest to add a warning to the "Before using
TorBirdy", where would be the right place to do so?
I am not sur
Hi guys,
What you explained is a little over my head. Also my capacities are very
limited at the moment. I will look into it, soon!
Thanks
S
l.m:
> Hi teor,
>
> You could run TorBirdy through its own instance of the tor client
> software, with a separate socks port.
>
> This would avoid many
Hi,
"Lodewijk andré de la porte" wrote:
>And just trying not to be dragnetted at all times. It's important
>to sometimes use Tor, just so that when you actually do (one
>day, for whatever reason!) it doesn't seem suspicious :)
If you're trying to avoid suspicion you should use Tor for
*everything
>The ip check hidden behind a warning dialog hinders obtaining
>useful data. I'll keep that in mind.
On second thought there is an advantage to discouraging the use of the
check. If something went wrong with the socks port setting using the
check would leak the intention to use tor by connecting
Hi Sophie,
>Options b) and c) would be very luxurious, but option a) really
>solved my problem, and seems quite important for those who
>come from a different background.
There's a strong correlation between the perceived usefulness to
end-users and their support for a FOSS project :) A simple
Hi teor,
You could run TorBirdy through its own instance of the tor client
software, with a separate socks port.
This would avoid many of the issues you're trying to work around in
b) and c), as TorBirdy could happily send NEWNYM to its own client
instance all it liked. There is a slightly inc
And finding information which for some reason is blocked in KR. I've had
some very normal websites block out because they trip the automatic
blocking for no apparent reason! Perhaps a word that's forbidden in some
language's slang appears by accident in my language's pages.
And just trying not to
> if a single or multiple exit relays in a
> declared MyFamily do things that get them the badexit flag. Will other
> relays in that family also get that flag?
>
> One such example is the following family where 2 out of 3 got the bad
> exit flag (the ones that got the flag were probably shutdown si
15 matches
Mail list logo
