On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:27:08 +, George Kadianakis wrote:
...
> FWIW, none of the above will actually help against a non-experienced
> user that uses tor2web to connect to an onion by mistake. Even with HS
> authorization or HTTP auth, the onion will forever be imprinted on
> that public list.
I'm not too surprised that list ruffled some feathers. Per your request,
I'll take it down. :)
If/when people get more used to the idea of being seen on the clear-net the
Disallowed might be resurrected.
Give the changes a few days to propagate.
-V
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:16 AM, George Kadia
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:16 PM, George Kadianakis
>> wrote:
> FWIW, none of the above will actually help against a non-experienced
> user that uses tor2web to connect to an onion by mistake.
> ...
> human factor
If users are that dumb then you can expect them to also be doing
all sorts of ot
HTTPS is now installed on the site. New version is up for download.
On 2/3/2015 9:33 AM, krishna e bera wrote:
On 15-02-02 09:57 PM, Mike Ingle wrote:
http://www.confidantmail.org
Mike Ingle
d2b89e6f95e72e26e0c917d02d1847dfecfcd0c2
I am curious why someone delivering security and pr
Yuri:
> Who/how will decide what resources will such comments be attached to?
> Where are they stored? You mention "relay" and "tor app". But there is
> no such thing as "tor app". Do you mean having something like
> distributed hash? Who will own such data? What is the way to ensure they
> don't d
On 03/04/2015 10:05, Lee Malek wrote:
I have an idea for a tor sub-project that would serve our purpose (fighting
censorship) perfectly.
I think your description is very vague, and lacks details, therefore
inviting only generic replies.
Who/how will decide what resources will such comments
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 05:37:58 -0600
goofyzrn...@vfemail.net wrote:
> Travis Bean:
> > a Gestapo government run amok!
> >
> > The terminology "Gestapo" translates to seventeen different
> > organizations
> > (http://www.intelligence.gov/mission/member-agencies.html)
> >
> > the Gestapo government he
Quoting Lara (2015-03-05 17:34:06)
> Have you used Bitmask over Tor?
> Have you written about your experience?
Right now you can not use bitmask over Tor, because up to now bitmask does VPN
on udp only and Tor only routes tcp connections. There is plans for near future
to support doing the VPN o
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 06:52:47 +0100
Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 17:26:32 +, Juan wrote:
> ...
> > Prime example : A country like china is firewalled so the
> > pentagon can't spy on the chinese internet directly. Hence,
> > tor.
>
> And how, exactly, does tor help
On 03/05/2015 11:07 AM, t...@t-3.net wrote:
>
> On 03:05:2015, Travis Bean wrote:
>
> > Stuff
>
> I wonder if this giant pile of mess you've posted in this mailing list
> is related to the products/services you are trying to sell on the web
> site linked in your sig?
>
> I didn't like what
On 03:05:2015, Travis Bean wrote:
> Stuff
I wonder if this giant pile of mess you've posted in this mailing list
is related to the products/services you are trying to sell on the web
site linked in your sig?
I didn't like what I read there. You seem to be offering more than is
possible wit
On 03/05/2015 04:33 AM, Ben Tasker wrote:
>> When it comes to those of you from the UK, your bizarre "conspiracy
>> theory" rhetoric is starting to get just a tad bit too creepy and
>> indicates it is time to get a grip on reality.
>
> Because in the absence of evidence, it is just that - a conspi
Goltz, Jim (NIH/CIT) [E]:
> If a list stops fulfilling these criteria, people like us
> unsubscribe, leaving the list to its inevitable decline, destined to
> join the ever-lengthening roll of moribund, flame-filled lists that
> no longer exist or have ceased to serve any useful function on the
> n
Have you used Bitmask over Tor?
Have you written about your experience?
Do share.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> So you use your perceived authority of an upset citizen to mask your
> incapacity to use filters?
Not all of us read this list on a MUA that has easy-to-use filters. We
generally subscribe to lists that contain useful information, have a high
signal-to-noise ratio, and are subscribed to by us
On 3/5/2015 6:37 AM, goofyzrn...@vfemail.net wrote:
Travis Bean:
a Gestapo government run amok!
The terminology "Gestapo" translates to seventeen different
organizations (http://www.intelligence.gov/mission/member-agencies.html)
the Gestapo government here in the United States
The Gestapo se
mick:
> Now can we all stop rising to troll bait?
So you use your perceived authority of an upset citizen to mask your
incapacity to use filters?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
Ben Tasker:
>> Another example of hypocrisy is America. There's no government
>> established killing camp system but at least 50 million have been
>> murdered since 1972/73 through abortion. In all of the former examples
>> it was deemed that there is a life not worth living and they aren't
>> real
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 04:15:57 -0800
Travis Bean allegedly wrote:
> On 03/05/2015 01:57 AM, Ben Tasker wrote:
> > You claim to have proof of this conspiracy, but have simply provided
> > conjecture based on the fact a number of sites (including Fox News)
> > block access from (certain) tor exit nod
> Please do pay attention to the terms you are using.
>
> A theory is a part of the scientific trajectory. What you are debating
> is a speculation at best, a delirium at least.
Whilst I agree with you, I think it's reasonable to say that a lot of
conspiracy theories wander into that bracket. You'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 3/5/2015 3:00 PM, Lara wrote:
> Ben Tasker:
>> Because in the absence of evidence, it is just that - a
>> conspiracy theory. You're asserting that Fox and the Govt (or at
>> least some of it's agencies) are conspiring, but have provided no
>> re
Ben Tasker:
> Because in the absence of evidence, it is just that - a conspiracy
> theory. You're asserting that Fox and the Govt (or at least some of
> it's agencies) are conspiring, but have provided no real no evidence
> to support it, hence theory.
Please do pay attention to the terms you ar
On 03/05/2015 04:33 AM, Ben Tasker wrote:
> There have been reports for quite some time of Fox blocking tor exits (see
> for example
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2015-January/036472.html),
> though I don't know when senate/usps started.
This report on tor-talk
(https://lists.t
> Another example of hypocrisy is America. There's no government
> established killing camp system but at least 50 million have been
> murdered since 1972/73 through abortion. In all of the former examples
> it was deemed that there is a life not worth living and they aren't
> really "people". Such
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015, at 12:37 PM, goofyzrn...@vfemail.net wrote:
> Travis Bean:
> > a Gestapo government run amok!
> >
> > The terminology "Gestapo" translates to seventeen different
> > organizations (http://www.intelligence.gov/mission/member-agencies.html)
> >
> > the Gestapo government here i
Travis Bean:
a Gestapo government run amok!
The terminology "Gestapo" translates to seventeen different
organizations (http://www.intelligence.gov/mission/member-agencies.html)
the Gestapo government here in the United States
The Gestapo sent millions of people to death camps [1-5]. The
co
> When it comes to those of you from the UK, your bizarre "conspiracy
> theory" rhetoric is starting to get just a tad bit too creepy and
> indicates it is time to get a grip on reality.
Because in the absence of evidence, it is just that - a conspiracy theory.
You're asserting that Fox and the Go
On 03/05/2015 01:57 AM, Ben Tasker wrote:
> You claim to have proof of this conspiracy, but have simply provided
> conjecture based on the fact a number of sites (including Fox News) block
> access from (certain) tor exit nodes. That some sites block tor users is
> neither news or outright proof of
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:53:04 +, Travis Bean wrote:
...
> It seems highly suspicious that those of you on this mailing list, who
> continue to make this out to be something other than the original post,
> are all mysteriously in the same boat with this scoundrel Rupert Murdoch.
The "you're eith
grarpamp writes:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:16 PM, George Kadianakis
> wrote:
>> I find their concern very valid
>
> Respectfully... invalid. Onions are going to be mined, shared, leaked,
> indexed, and copied anyways. And most certainly by your adversaries.
> Do we forget merely publishing an
> Why would I go to the bother of filing police reports if this was
> all make believe???
If you didn't believe it was 'make believe' then you might file reports,
even if it truly is make believe.
> Those of you from the UK, who are in the same boat with this lying,
> conniving meth dealer Rupert
On 03/04/2015 10:49 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> The OP writes about widely known digital surveillance and political
> corruption,
> then seems to conclude that both are aimed at his own personal activity.
> The missing threads that would otherwise connect the two plus the heightened
> language le
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:16 PM, George Kadianakis wrote:
> I find their concern very valid
Respectfully... invalid. Onions are going to be mined, shared, leaked,
indexed, and copied anyways. And most certainly by your adversaries.
Do we forget merely publishing an onion to the dirs results in ac
33 matches
Mail list logo
