Re: [tor-talk] [tor-consensus-health] Consensus issues

2014-08-16 Thread Sebastian G.
17.08.2014, 00:27 Sebastian Hahn: @Damian Johnson (to avoid sending two emails) I wouldn't have worried either if I wouldn't have found it strange to see the notice for tor26. Please read on below. > thanks for looking after the network! The doctor is doing that for me. I just wanted to figure

Re: [tor-talk] [tor-consensus-health] Consensus issues

2014-08-16 Thread Sebastian Hahn
Hi Sebastian, thanks for looking after the network! On 16 Aug 2014, at 22:56, Sebastian G. wrote: > On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 19:46:15 + (UTC) the doctor said: >> NOTICE: Consensus belonging to maatuska was missing the following authority >> signatures: tor26 >> NOTICE: Consensus belonging to tor

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: [tor-consensus-health] Consensus issues

2014-08-16 Thread Damian Johnson
Hi Sebastian. Generally I don't worry about a transient error like this since it could be due to, say, tor26 restarting for maintenance or to upgrade. If we consistently get notices then I notify the respective directory authority. Cheers! -Damian On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Sebastian G.

[tor-talk] Fwd: [tor-consensus-health] Consensus issues

2014-08-16 Thread Sebastian G.
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 19:46:15 + (UTC) the doctor said: > NOTICE: Consensus belonging to maatuska was missing the following authority > signatures: tor26 > NOTICE: Consensus belonging to tor26 was missing the following authority > signatures: tor26 > NOTICE: Consensus belonging to urras was mi

Re: [tor-talk] Free Decentralized VOIP over Tor

2014-08-16 Thread W . Greenhouse
Hi Terry, ter...@safe-mail.net writes: > Hi, > > Has there been any proposals to develop a free decentralized VOIP > network for Tor? Mumble, best known as a voice groupchat software for gamers, has been the subject of some Tor experiments, because it has Push to Talk support to help deal with h

Re: [tor-talk] Performance

2014-08-16 Thread Fabian Keil
Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:18:23PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote: > > The Privoxy part of the chain could be an issue. What is your > > reason for using Privoxy? > > In general, I find Tor to be faster overall, since overhauls in > > TorBrowser - when they stopped using Priv

Re: [tor-talk] computing the Tor Metric's "advertised bandwidth" and "read bandwidth" from the archived Tor consensus

2014-08-16 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 15/08/14 00:22, Virgil Griffith wrote: > I've been parsing the historical collecTor consensus files using the Stem > library. I want to be able to recreate the existing numbers before I delve > into new stuff, so I am attempting to recreate some datapoints from the > Metrics site. > > The "rou