On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 19:46:15 +0000 (UTC) the doctor said: > NOTICE: Consensus belonging to maatuska was missing the following authority > signatures: tor26 > NOTICE: Consensus belonging to tor26 was missing the following authority > signatures: tor26 > NOTICE: Consensus belonging to urras was missing the following authority > signatures: tor26 > NOTICE: Consensus belonging to dizum was missing the following authority > signatures: tor26 > NOTICE: Consensus belonging to gabelmoo was missing the following authority > signatures: tor26 > NOTICE: Consensus belonging to moria1 was missing the following authority > signatures: tor26 > NOTICE: Consensus belonging to dannenberg was missing the following authority > signatures: tor26 > NOTICE: Consensus belonging to Faravahar was missing the following authority > signatures: tor26
If I understand this messages correctly tor26 didn't sign the consensus of any other authority. (Correct me if I'm wrong.) How is it possible that tor26 doesn't sign its own consensus? A similar message was send on the 15th for gabelmoo, but gabelmoo had no notice line. There were two warning, first gabelmoo did not publish a fresh consensus and secondly it did not report bandwidth scanner results. Nothing I would have worried about. Nor would I have found strange. However an authority handing out a consensus it didn't sign might be something that isn't quite right. Regards, Sebastian G. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
