On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:24:46PM -0800, alb...@openbuddha.com wrote 0.9K
bytes in 0 lines about:
: Doesn’t streaming HD video through Tor degrade the entire network?
I doubt it. HD video is roughly ~1-2 mbps. I do it all the time through
youtube.
--
Andrew
http://tpo.is/contact
pgp 0x6B4D6475
Make that "why blocking Tor exits is largely pointless".
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On 02/07/2014 01:55 PM, James Marshall wrote:
> As others have pointed out, the fact (?) that Tor users are no more likely
> to abuse may not matter as much as the *perception* that they are. However
> unfairly, the perception of something often carries the day more than the
> facts, and should be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2014 12:50 PM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Nymspace collision is a real problem, folks!
Another agument for PGP signing everything...
And now, back on topic for this mailing list.
- --
The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS]
Developer, Project Byzan
The Doctor wrote:
> tor-admin wrote:
> > This message was reported by the Doctor:
>
> ...I said what?
Nymspace collision is a real problem, folks!
~Saint ^H^H^H Griffin
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject
As others have pointed out, the fact (?) that Tor users are no more likely
to abuse may not matter as much as the *perception* that they are. However
unfairly, the perception of something often carries the day more than the
facts, and should be addressed when possible.
At the risk of sounding sel
Al Billings wrote:
> Doesn’t streaming HD video through Tor degrade the entire network?
The problem he's having is *literally* an entirely different issue.
He's using a standard browser to visit Hulu. They are blocking him
because he's a middle relay, despite the fact that blocking Tor relay
ops
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2014 11:05 PM, tor-admin wrote:
> This message was reported by the Doctor:
...I said what?
- --
The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS]
Developer, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantium.org/
PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89
Doesn’t streaming HD video through Tor degrade the entire network?
From: Missouri Anglers Missouri Anglers
Reply: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Date: February 7, 2014 at 12:11:23 PM
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-tal
On 2/7/2014 12:42 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote:
This is in re: Hulu (whis is presumably authenticated)... but really,
it applies to any service which we, the legitimate users of Tor,
are denied access to.
It has simply gone too far and we should be putting effort into
reversing this trend by interac
So, I should clarify:
The computer on which I received this error was not running Tor at all.
Not as a daemon; not the TBB.
I run a non-exit relay, on my same home network and thus the same public
facing IP as my public facing relay.
My conclusion that Hulu blocks Tor was based on the following
Missouri Anglers:
> Hulu requires JavaScript to work properly.
> If you enable JavaScript when visiting the site
> does that not defeat the purpose of using TOR?
Note: JavaScript is not the same as Java. Please also see:
https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#TBBJavaScriptEnabled
--
tor-ta
Soul Plane:
> Is it ok to use the Tor Browser without Tor?
What do you mean by "ok"?
Ethical? Sure.
Legal? In most countries, where Firefox/Tor Browser is legal, this would
be legal as well.
Possible? Yes.
Useful? The more people doing it, the better.
> I don't need Tor but I like
> the privacy f
Hulu requires JavaScript to work properly.
If you enable JavaScript when visiting the site
does that not defeat the purpose of using TOR?
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:54:41 -0700
Joshua Datko wrote:
> As I tried to watch Family Guy, I received this message from Hulu:
>
>
> Based on your IP addr
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:46:32PM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> So many sites that we all use are now blacklisting Tor. It's unclear
> whether it is via their use of tools that blindly utilize blacklists,
> or if they are making a conscious choice to deny Tor users. As far
> as I'm concerned, we are al
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 02:00:02 -0500
Soul Plane wrote:
> Is it ok to use the Tor Browser without Tor? I don't need Tor but I like
> the privacy features that the browser offers.
Yes you can. I use that way for transparent torifycation in Linux,
manually restarting Browser and changing tor-circuits
grarpamp:
> So many sites that we all use are now blacklisting Tor. It's unclear
> whether it is via their use of tools that blindly utilize blacklists,
> or if they are making a conscious choice to deny Tor users. As far
> as I'm concerned, we are all legitimate users of their services and
> quit
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:14:28PM +0100, tor-admin wrote:
> Sebastian, thanks for clarification. I remember there were some late changes
> #9063, #9072, #9093, and #10169 which made it into 2.4.X because of the DOS
> issues Rob Jansen described in https://blog.torproject.org/blog/new-tor-
> den
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hmmm... I've been thinking about all this stuff, and reading up on the
PDFs.
I think "the parrot is dead" is a little over strict in his analysis,
I highly doubt they have technology as good as this yet and probably
wont have any time soon, so yes i
On Friday 07 February 2014 09:50:52 Sebastian Hahn wrote:
> The idea is to recommend all versions which aren't known to be bad, so
> that an operator who reads their Tor logs will realize their Tor really
> needs to be upgraded in order to remain secure/operational when theysee
> it. So, if an -rc
> What can we do, as a collective social entity, to put an end to
> this madness? It is not as if we, as Tor users, present any more
> of a load upon their help/fraud/abuse desks than the wider open
> internet as a whole, even when if perhaps adjusted for market share
> of source IP's. So what can
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:33:08AM -0800, Al Jigong Billings wrote:
> Or maybe people got tired of the minority of trolls and nazis that seem to
> come through Tor to infest some sites. I know people who block Tor. It is
> usually because a disproportionate amount of the abuse on their site comes
>
Hi,
On 06.02.2014 21:20, David Balažic wrote:
> I now tried a clean installation of TBB 3.5.1 win32
>
> I change the option from "Never remember history" to "Remember History".
> It requested a restart.
> Then I checked and it was "Use custom settings for history".
> I looked at the TorButton ext
Hi,
On 07 Feb 2014, at 08:05, tor-admin wrote:
> This message was reported by the Doctor:
>
> NOTICE: The following directory authorities recommend other client versions
> than the consensus: gabelmoo +0.2.2.39 +0.2.4.15-rc +0.2.4.5-alpha +0.2.4.6-
> alpha +0.2.4.7-alpha +0.2.4.10-alpha +0.2.4.
grarpamp:
> So many sites that we all use are now blacklisting Tor. It's unclear
> whether it is via their use of tools that blindly utilize blacklists,
> or if they are making a conscious choice to deny Tor users. As far
> as I'm concerned, we are all legitimate users of their services and
> quite
Or maybe people got tired of the minority of trolls and nazis that seem to
come through Tor to infest some sites. I know people who block Tor. It is
usually because a disproportionate amount of the abuse on their site comes
from Tor users. Anonymity turns some people into trolls.
On Feb 7, 2014 12
This message was reported by the Doctor:
NOTICE: The following directory authorities recommend other client versions
than the consensus: gabelmoo +0.2.2.39 +0.2.4.15-rc +0.2.4.5-alpha +0.2.4.6-
alpha +0.2.4.7-alpha +0.2.4.10-alpha +0.2.4.12-alpha +0.2.4.13-alpha
+0.2.4.14-alpha +0.2.4.9-alpha +0
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:46:32PM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> So many sites that we all use are now blacklisting Tor. It's unclear
> whether it is via their use of tools that blindly utilize blacklists,
> or if they are making a conscious choice to deny Tor users. As far
> as I'm concerned, we are al
28 matches
Mail list logo
