On 2/11/13 11:28 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>>> least cause them to distribute a version of their datasets
>>> that retain the original locations.
>>
>> I asked their (first-level) support a few months ago, and they said
>> they're considering providing data sets without A1 codes some time this
>> year.
>
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 11:23 -0600, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 2/12/2013 8:41 AM, Ted Smith wrote:
> > I use riseup.net -- I trust their promise not to store any logs, I
> > know they'll never block Tor, and they don't have any ads in their web
> > interface. That said, if you're financially stable i
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> This is an oft-overlooked point about Riseup. They never did approve me
> for an account. I'm sketchy. ;P
Don't say... Do you approve of “a vanguard strategy for revolution”?
Or support “the idea that class oppression supersedes race or gend
Joe Btfsplk wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Though I don't use them - yet, Lavabit is more serious about privacy, &
> has reasonable storage (nothing as large as gmail).
>
I have had good luck with Lavabit as well, but according to people on
another list, they've started restricting accounts for Tor users
On 2/12/2013 12:47 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 12.02.2013 17:09, Jan Reister wrote:
Il 12/02/2013 10:42, Roman Mamedov ha scritto:
In the past I used http://www.autistici.org/en/services/mail.html
I recommend autistici.org if you are in Europe, it's based in Italy.
Reliable service with strong
I did not mean 'republishes [same]', but 'choose new intros and publish'.
Note HS descriptors only concern IntroPoint IP's. Not yours or
your path or TCP state to them.
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/
adrelanos:
> Jacob Appelbaum:
>> intrigeri:
>>> Hi Jacob,
>>>
>>> Jacob Appelbaum wrote (12 Feb 2013 00:54:46 GMT) :
After quite a long development cycle, we've tagged torsocks 1.3 today:
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torsocks.git/shortlog/refs/tags/1.3
>>>
>>> Awesome!
>>>
>>> Do you p
intrigeri:
> Hi,
>
> Jacob Appelbaum wrote (12 Feb 2013 16:40:01 GMT) :
>> Would you like a tar.gz and a tar.gz.asc?
>
> A Git tag integrates perfectly with packaging workflow... iff it's the
> canonical form of distribution of the complete upstream release.
>
> If a tarball with slightly differ
> Would modifying "RendPostPeriod" help with this timeout?
>
> It seems like the lowest value I can set for that is 600 seconds. I
> would rather it be something like 6 seconds for this scenario, but I can
> understand how that might cause a problem.
I can't answer if tor senses and republishes on
On 12.02.2013 17:09, Jan Reister wrote:
> Il 12/02/2013 10:42, Roman Mamedov ha scritto:
>> In the past I used http://www.autistici.org/en/services/mail.html
> I recommend autistici.org if you are in Europe, it's based in Italy.
> Reliable service with strong privacy mind, good italian/english
> co
Jacob Appelbaum:
> intrigeri:
>> Hi Jacob,
>>
>> Jacob Appelbaum wrote (12 Feb 2013 00:54:46 GMT) :
>>> After quite a long development cycle, we've tagged torsocks 1.3 today:
>>> https://gitweb.torproject.org/torsocks.git/shortlog/refs/tags/1.3
>>
>> Awesome!
>>
>> Do you plan to release it in fo
grarpamp:
> I believe the answer is sortof. Your HS is still there and happy after
> the IP/TCP and all rework themselves. But there are now probably
> two different HS descriptors published in six places and you need
> to wait for one to timeout. See what rend-spec and man page says.
Would modify
Hi,
Jacob Appelbaum wrote (12 Feb 2013 16:40:01 GMT) :
> Would you like a tar.gz and a tar.gz.asc?
A Git tag integrates perfectly with packaging workflow... iff it's the
canonical form of distribution of the complete upstream release.
If a tarball with slightly different content (e.g. that inclu
On 2/12/2013 8:41 AM, Ted Smith wrote:
I use riseup.net -- I trust their promise not to store any logs, I
know they'll never block Tor, and they don't have any ads in their web
interface. That said, if you're financially stable in a first-world
country, you should probably throw some bitcoins t
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
wrote:
> On 2/12/13 3:04 PM, Alexandre Dulaunoy wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Looking at the current ways of people getting .onion addresses
>> (using dubious forums or source), I was wondering if there is someone
>> working/researching on a way
On 2/12/13 3:04 PM, Alexandre Dulaunoy wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Looking at the current ways of people getting .onion addresses
> (using dubious forums or source), I was wondering if there is someone
> working/researching on a way to rank .onion addresses to allow a user
> to see the ranking/trust of an
intrigeri:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> Jacob Appelbaum wrote (12 Feb 2013 00:54:46 GMT) :
>> After quite a long development cycle, we've tagged torsocks 1.3 today:
>> https://gitweb.torproject.org/torsocks.git/shortlog/refs/tags/1.3
>
> Awesome!
>
> Do you plan to release it in form of a tarball,
> or is
Il 12/02/2013 10:42, Roman Mamedov ha scritto:
> In the past I used http://www.autistici.org/en/services/mail.html
I recommend autistici.org if you are in Europe, it's based in Italy.
Reliable service with strong privacy mind, good italian/english
communication with users in case of outages and ot
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 10:13 +0100, Karsten N. wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 01:47 AM, bvvq wrote:
> > I would like to change.
>
> You may try VFEmail https://www.vfemail.net/
>
> For a one-time payment of $15 you get an good service. Use an anonymous
> prepaid credit card to stay anonymous. Free service
Hi All,
Looking at the current ways of people getting .onion addresses
(using dubious forums or source), I was wondering if there is someone
working/researching on a way to rank .onion addresses to allow a user
to see the ranking/trust of an .onion address.
Thank you.
--
-- Al
Tor: 0.2.3.25, 0.2.4.10
Broken: NumCPUs via HAVE_PTHREAD_CREATE
Fix: LDFLAGS=-pthread ./configure ...
Ticket: 3894
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> Does the fact that my actual IP address has changed (say my Tor client
> moves from a 3G to a wifi connection), or by extension, by Tor client
> has stopped and started, have any impact on the availability of a Hidden
> Service I am hosting?
I believe the answer is sortof. Your HS is still there
Hi Jacob,
Jacob Appelbaum wrote (12 Feb 2013 00:54:46 GMT) :
> After quite a long development cycle, we've tagged torsocks 1.3 today:
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/torsocks.git/shortlog/refs/tags/1.3
Awesome!
Do you plan to release it in form of a tarball,
or is the Git tag the canonical way
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I rather like tormail, because the provider can't hand over any
information even if they wanted to. You access it via a .onion so the
actual locations of the remailers is unknown.
> None of Tor Mail's mail systems are hosted on this server, or on
>
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:47:53 +1100
bvvq wrote:
> Hi tor-talk,
>
> I'm not sure where else to ask this question so I give my apologies if
> this is off-topic. Please feel free to suggest a better list/forum/website.
>
> I've had a personal email account with GMail since it was invite-only,
> b
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:11:33AM +, Nathan Freitas wrote:
> Does the fact that my actual IP address has changed (say my Tor client
> moves from a 3G to a wifi connection), or by extension, by Tor client
> has stopped and started, have any impact on the availability of a Hidden
> Service I am
> orconfig.h:/* #undef HAVE_PTHREAD_CREATE */
Here it's libc_r or -pthread, not -lpthread. Will try to
bypass configure, set to 1 and play with compile libs.
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mai
If I specify 'numcpus' greater than zero, should tor bypass
all auto compute and fork or thread the given number
regardless? I tell it 2 and get 1, so somewhere I'm
missing another auto or hardware sanity check in the code
besides src/or/config.c get_num_cpus and the CPUWORKER
defines?
SMP on the b
On 02/12/2013 01:47 AM, bvvq wrote:
> I would like to change.
You may try VFEmail https://www.vfemail.net/
For a one-time payment of $15 you get an good service. Use an anonymous
prepaid credit card to stay anonymous. Free service works well with
SMTP, POP and IMAP too but contains ads and taglin
Does the fact that my actual IP address has changed (say my Tor client
moves from a 3G to a wifi connection), or by extension, by Tor client
has stopped and started, have any impact on the availability of a Hidden
Service I am hosting?
What I am seeing is that I can initially connect to a HS host
30 matches
Mail list logo
