On 2/11/13 11:28 PM, grarpamp wrote: >>> least cause them to distribute a version of their datasets >>> that retain the original locations. >> >> I asked their (first-level) support a few months ago, and they said >> they're considering providing data sets without A1 codes some time this >> year. > > Any wiki'ers on the list want to wiki things like this with campaign and > followup tasks? If you can write your congress/mp from a task list, why > not your favorite Tor unfriendly website, etc. > >> https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/blob/HEAD:/src/config/deanonymind.py >> https://gitweb.torproject.org/onionoo.git/blob/HEAD:/geoip/deanonymind.py > > Sure, those are fixes for Tor et al's use. I was more addressing the > "proxies bad, let's put them in an A1" issue that affects everyone > else.
If we want to fix this for other people, maybe somebody should take the scripts above and produce a "FreeMind" database for everyone else to use. I don't have the time to start this or keep it running, but I'm happy to contribute or discuss as time permits. > Some of the manual substitutions could be take from the descriptors, > if people didn't enter silly/inaccurate CC codes in them. If there are wrong substitutions, contacting relay operators to get more data points is a fine option. But we should confirm reports using RIR delegations, traceroute, etc. Best, Karsten >> If I could spend more time on this topic, I wouldn't want to visit >> MaxMind headquarters > > I meant to say that there are at least two major IP location companies, > and a few others. Just say hi at the next geolocation conference ;) > > I do suggest presenting at the next NANOG conference. That would > cover a lot of the network space, make introductions, etc. > >> but I'd want to further extend Jake's blockfinder >> and come up with our own free GeoIP database: >> https://github.com/ioerror/blockfinder > > Years ago I thought there were some crowdsourced IP location > projects. While not being commercial where ISP's would > perhaps be more inclined to input their provisioning tables, they > covered userland's knowledge and self-submittals pretty good. > These projects have to still exist? > _______________________________________________ > tor-talk mailing list > tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
