On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:21 AM, wrote:
> Do you mean 1) the exit node admin should setup to use an open proxy to
> protect him? Or 2) do you mean if the users would in some cases set this up
> their self?
>
> For case 1) this wouldn't be the most wise thing to do... Explanation...
>
> Those ope
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> >> Now imagine the idea Tor + open proxy gets promoted because the devs
> >> encourage that with a new option like Tor + your personal extra proxy
> >> chain... That wouldn't give Tor more credibility as it would be even
> >> harder to s
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:37:32AM -0800, helia...@gmail.com wrote 1.5K bytes
in 49 lines about:
: My Mozilla Firefox browser (most recent version) slows down after
: about 15 minutes, so that it becomes inoperable. Could this be
: happening as a way to prevent someone using TOR/Vidalia?
What's y
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 03:30, wrote:
> > It's not recommend. And for cleartext http (not https) there will be now
> > not one, but two servers who can log and tamper your cleartext traffic.
>
> So there is no principal difference from a security standpoint.
>
> > There is a paper where they
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 03:30, wrote:
> > It's not recommend. And for cleartext http (not https) there will be now
> > not one, but two servers who can log and tamper your cleartext traffic.
>
> So there is no principal difference from a security standpoint.
Agreed. Just the more proxy's coul
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 01:33:58PM +0100, li...@infosecurity.ch wrote 0.6K
bytes in 19 lines about:
: i did noticed that Tor sometime take a lot of time to make a bootstrap,
: especially when using private bridge.
: Wouldn't make sense to ship Tor client with latest available consensus
: and direc
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
>> Now imagine the idea Tor + open proxy gets promoted because the devs
>> encourage that with a new option like Tor + your personal extra proxy
>> chain... That wouldn't give Tor more credibility as it would be even harder
>> to stop abuse
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 03:30, wrote:
> It's not recommend. And for cleartext http (not https) there will be now not
> one, but two servers who can log and tamper your cleartext traffic.
So there is no principal difference from a security standpoint.
> There is a paper where they explain the ch
> I know about proxychains and windows implementations of it and I
> woudn`t ask for help if it was that easy as "proxychains
> firefox" :)
Oh no offense. I added it for completely reasons. And I think proxychains isn't
that well known.
> VPN through Tor is in my todo list, so i will appreciate
> > What iptables rules have to be used to forward everything through Tor?
>
> I've never tried it but I'm pretty sure this is what you're looking for...
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TransparentProxy
Unfortunately not.
The TransparentProxy is good. TorVPN somehow based on
Hi, thanks for detailed reply!
I know about proxychains and windows implementations of it and I
woudn`t ask for help if it was that easy as "proxychains
firefox" :) But I checked again and proxychains with regular
browser works with at least tor local socks5 proxy as 1st hop and http
proxy as 2nd
> What iptables rules have to be used to forward everything through Tor?
I've never tried it but I'm pretty sure this is what you're looking for...
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TransparentProxy
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@list
What iptables rules have to be used to forward everything through Tor?
That's what I've got so far.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorVPN
Any help is greatly appreciated.
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https:/
Dear Roger et al.,
My Mozilla Firefox browser (most recent version) slows down after
about 15 minutes, so that it becomes inoperable. Could this be
happening as a way to prevent someone using TOR/Vidalia?
Thanks,
Scott
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 9:48 AM, wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 11:19
Hi
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:22 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 06:45:06AM +0100, andr...@fastmail.fm wrote 0.5K
> bytes in 14 lines about:
> : I've found that the new TBB (Linux) doesn't have the Script blocker
> : addon. It used to be the letter "S" next to the web address bar.
>
> On w
I did testing of both sniffjoke and obfsproxy with Tor this summer. [1][2]
I had trouble getting sniffjoke to work reliably enough to actually test
its properties against DPI attacks. I found obfsproxy to be reliable, but
at that time it was designed to work against only some of the known DPI
attac
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 06:45:06AM +0100, andr...@fastmail.fm wrote 0.5K bytes
in 14 lines about:
: I've found that the new TBB (Linux) doesn't have the Script blocker
: addon. It used to be the letter "S" next to the web address bar.
On which package do you see this lack of noscript? Noscript
Sometimes when I try to import a key as per the TBB download
instructions the process works fine; but at other times the transaction
goes as follows:
C:\"Program Files (x86)"\Gnu\GnuPg\gpg2.exe --keyserver
x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 0x63FEE659
gpg: requesting key 63FEE659 fro
On 01/06/2012 12:49 PM, anonym wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It was recently suggested [1] that Tails [2] should include
> sniffjoke [3], persumably to uncensor Tor in places where that is a
> problem:
>
> Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>> Adding sniff joke may be quite useful and it should be an option:
>> http://w
Hi,
It was recently suggested [1] that Tails [2] should include
sniffjoke [3], persumably to uncensor Tor in places where that is a
problem:
Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> Adding sniff joke may be quite useful and it should be an option:
> http://www.delirandom.net/sniffjoke/
(Jacob is especially wel
Hi,
i did noticed that Tor sometime take a lot of time to make a bootstrap,
especially when using private bridge.
Wouldn't make sense to ship Tor client with latest available consensus
and directory information already built-in?
A part from the implementation complexity (on-the-fly packaging of
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:15:31AM +0100, François Huguet wrote:
> An article about TOR, *Project Vigilant and BBHC Global* in french by
> Primavera De Filippi:
>
> http://adam.hypotheses.org/1149
Short summary: Tor was created by the US Navy. Then hijacked by the EFF.
And now it has been hijacke
22 matches
Mail list logo
