On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:21 AM,  <h...@safe-mail.net> wrote:
> Do you mean 1) the exit node admin should setup to use an open proxy to 
> protect him? Or 2) do you mean if the users would in some cases set this up 
> their self?
>
> For case 1) this wouldn't be the most wise thing to do... Explanation...
>
> Those open proxy lists... Well, my guess how they are created... Some people 
> are scanning the internet and if they find an open proxy they'll add it to 
> the list. But it does not mean the admin of the open proxy is aware that he 
> is hosting an open proxy. In many cases open proxy's are just misconfigured 
> home or enterprise networks. Few are probable hosting them for evil reasons 
> and a minority for good reasons (want to give anonymity to people out of the 
> goodness of their heart like some tor node admins).
>
> Not sure it's a good idea or legal to use someone as proxy without his 
> consent, even if it's an open proxy from an open proxy list it can not be 
> sure he is aware of that. Not sure if that would be good for the reputation 
> and legality of Tor.


I meant case 1).
I have absolutely zero knowledge of US law. I don't know if
hidemyass.com are getting into trouble for posting a list of open
proxies. Sometimes this kind of stuff get fixed with a disclaimer, but
that's up to Tor team and their lawyers to decide. After all, law is
just one more protocol.
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Reply via email to