> I get the feeling that I'm annoying you so I'll try to stop that by avoiding
> any further
> such DocTor requests.
Hi nusenu, I'm not annoyed in the least - sorry if I gave that impression!
My read is that you asked for a notification when bandwidth
authorities are missing, which we already ha
> Hi nusenu, the notice pretty clearly says that one isn't present...
>
> "NOTICE: The following directory authorities are not reporting
> bandwidth scanner results: gabelmoo"
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-consensus-health/2018-February/008624.html
(email from Tue Feb 27 07:05:55 UT
Hi nusenu, the notice pretty clearly says that one isn't present...
"NOTICE: The following directory authorities are not reporting
bandwidth scanner results: gabelmoo"
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-consensus-health/2018-February/008624.html
You're right that it doesn't tell you the n
Damian Johnson:
> Hi nusenu, hi teor. We already have a check that we have the expected
> bandwidth authorities...
>
By reading today's emails from
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-consensus-health
it is not clear that we are currently with <3 bw auths - would be nice
Hi nusenu, hi teor. We already have a check that we have the expected
bandwidth authorities...
https://gitweb.torproject.org/doctor.git/tree/consensus_health_checker.py#n541
... and that they're reasonably in sync...
https://gitweb.torproject.org/doctor.git/tree/consensus_health_checker.py#n744
> On 28 Feb 2018, at 05:47, nusenu wrote:
>
> Hi Damian,
>
> would be great to have a check in DocTor that sends out an email
> for "there are less than 3 bw auth voting auths available"
Let's have two different checks:
"There are less than 3 bw auth votes in a consensus"
"There are a large nu
Hi Damian,
would be great to have a check in DocTor that sends out an email
for "there are less than 3 bw auth voting auths available"
thanks,
nusenu
--
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
twitter: @nusenu_
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
