bar
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 02:56:52PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> foo
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 09:44:05AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> Currently, pcap_setdirection() is described in pcap.3 as follows:
>
> pcap_setdirection() is used to limit the direction
> that packets must be flowing in order to be captured.
>
> The "direction" is not described, except in pcap.h.
unrelated to this topic, I suspect your smtpd is fairly old right ?
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:33:57AM -0400, James Turner wrote:
> espie@openbsd, dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
> Bcc:
> Subject: Re: sqlite 3.8.11.1
> Reply-To:
> In-Reply-To: <20150909084510.gh30...@tazenat.gentiane.org>
>
> On Wed, S
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:13:11PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> unrelated to this topic, I suspect your smtpd is fairly old right ?
>
If this is about my fucked up response I think that was all on me and a
failed Mutt reply.
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:33:57AM -0400, James Turner wrote:
> > e
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:13:11PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> unrelated to this topic, I suspect your smtpd is fairly old right ?
>
Running a snapshot from 9/2.
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:33:57AM -0400, James Turner wrote:
> > espie@openbsd, dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
> > Bcc:
> > Subject: R
On 2015/09/09 11:33, James Turner wrote:
> espie@openbsd, dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
> Bcc:
> Subject: Re: sqlite 3.8.11.1
> Reply-To:
> In-Reply-To: <20150909084510.gh30...@tazenat.gentiane.org>
>
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 08:45:10AM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > thanks to the h
In OpenBSD we just write that as "free(mp)", the "if" isn't required.
Will remember it ;-)
Index: fuse.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libfuse/fuse.c,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -p -r1.24 fuse.c
--- fuse.c 20 May 2014 13:32:22 -
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:04:21PM -0600, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, at 08:53 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> > I agree with "so-called" having negative connotations.
> >
> > I think both those instances are using it intentionally, namely there
> > are nasty surprises in some MBR blocks
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, at 08:53 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> I agree with "so-called" having negative connotations.
>
> I think both those instances are using it intentionally, namely there
> are nasty surprises in some MBR blocks that are not covered by
> the so-called MBR standard.
There's an actual
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 15:53, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:08:29PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> I generally associate negative connotations with so-called, as in
>> the "so-called free world". I wouldn't use it just to name something,
>> as in "the kernel is written in the so-cal
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:08:29PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> I generally associate negative connotations with so-called, as in
> the "so-called free world". I wouldn't use it just to name something,
> as in "the kernel is written in the so-called C language". so-called
> implies "it's called this
11 matches
Mail list logo
