On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:13:11PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> unrelated to this topic, I suspect your smtpd is fairly old right ?
> 

If this is about my fucked up response I think that was all on me and a
failed Mutt reply.

> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:33:57AM -0400, James Turner wrote:
> > espie@openbsd, dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
> > Bcc: 
> > Subject: Re: sqlite 3.8.11.1
> > Reply-To: 
> > In-Reply-To: <20150909084510.gh30...@tazenat.gentiane.org>
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 08:45:10AM +0000, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > thanks to the hard work of jturner@, here's a 650kb gzipped update to
> > > > sqlite 3.8.11.1, bumping shlib to 31.0. This is needed for upcoming
> > > > firefox 41 update, but anyone is welcome to look into the update itself.
> > > > 
> > > > Not attaching the diff because of the size, available at
> > > > http://rhaalovely.net/~landry/stuff/sqlite-3.8.11.1.diff.gz
> > > 
> > > Do we really need to import lib/libsqlite3/ext/fts5/test/ which amounts
> > > for half of the diff?
> > > 
> > 
> > To give a little background on why we have all these directories and
> > files based on my understanding...
> > 
> > When espie@ imported sqlite he wanted to follow upstream so he imported
> > what was distrubuted with sqlite. Since then we do tagged (based on the
> > sqlite version) imports whenever we do an update. So when a diff is sent
> > out it includes all new files in that sqlite release. In this case there
> > is a new fts5 backend which contains a lot of tests (which we never
> > run). We also haven't enabled the fts5 backend at this time.
> > 
> > Now we could change strategies and I could only create a diff of the
> > changes we actually want and then remove all these extra files from our
> > tree and the use commit rather then import going forward.
> > 
> > I would be fine with this as it would make each update more manageable
> > but I'm not sure what espie@ original goals where with following
> > upstream.
> > 
> > -- 
> > James Turner
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Gilles Chehade
> 
> https://www.poolp.org                                          @poolpOrg

-- 
James Turner

Reply via email to