Re: sparc64: bootblocks vs ofwboot load address

2020-06-05 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 10:12:40AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > Miod remarked the overwriting of the bootblocks actually is a > regression I introduced. So teintroduce the lost comment and load > ofwboot at 0x6000. OK kn

Re: sparc64: bootblocks vs ofwboot load address

2020-06-05 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:12:40 +0200 > From: Otto Moerbeek > > Hi, > > Miod remarked the overwriting of the bootblocks actually is a > regression I introduced. So teintroduce the lost comment and load > ofwboot at 0x6000. > > OK? ok kettenis@ > Index: bootblk.fth >

sparc64: bootblocks vs ofwboot load address

2020-06-05 Thread Otto Moerbeek
Hi, Miod remarked the overwriting of the bootblocks actually is a regression I introduced. So teintroduce the lost comment and load ofwboot at 0x6000. OK? -Otto Index: bootblk.fth === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/sparc64/st