On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 10:12:40AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > Miod remarked the overwriting of the bootblocks actually is a > regression I introduced. So teintroduce the lost comment and load > ofwboot at 0x6000. OK kn
- sparc64: bootblocks vs ofwboot load address Otto Moerbeek
- Re: sparc64: bootblocks vs ofwboot load address Mark Kettenis
- Re: sparc64: bootblocks vs ofwboot load address Klemens Nanni