Sorry for my fuckin' iphone... I really apologise ...
--
Eric Jacquot
Le 26 sept. 2010 ` 00:00, "Eric Jacquot" a icrit :
> Le 23 sept. 2010 ` 08:57, "Sebastian Reitenbach"
> a icrit :
>
> On Wednesday 22 September 2010
> 11:19:28 pm Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 05:20:04PM +0
Le 23 sept. 2010 ` 08:57, "Sebastian Reitenbach"
a icrit :
On Wednesday 22 September 2010
11:19:28 pm Landry Breuil wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 05:20:04PM +0200,
Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
Alexander Hall wrote:
I don't have any actual
interest in the change myself, nor the time to
test
On Wednesday 22 September 2010 11:19:28 pm Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 05:20:04PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > Alexander Hall wrote:
> > > I don't have any actual interest in the change myself, nor the time to
> > > test it, but now at least the diff has the fixes I exp
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 05:20:04PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> Alexander Hall wrote:
> > I don't have any actual interest in the change myself, nor the time to
> > test it, but now at least the diff has the fixes I expected to see
> > regarding my prior concerns.
> >
>
> Anyone else wh
Alexander Hall wrote:
> I don't have any actual interest in the change myself, nor the time to
> test it, but now at least the diff has the fixes I expected to see
> regarding my prior concerns.
>
Anyone else who would test or comment on this one?
Tested so far by me: telnetting to apache, and
I don't have any actual interest in the change myself, nor the time to
test it, but now at least the diff has the fixes I expected to see
regarding my prior concerns.
/Alexander
On 09/13/10 19:50, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> Again,
>
> as I was pointed out the patch was borked, and actually do
Again,
as I was pointed out the patch was borked, and actually documentation missing,
here is a new one, including the documentation.
Sebastian
On Monday, September 13, 2010 18:26 CEST, Sebastian Reitenbach
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached a new revision of the patch. Please comment, and let me
Hi,
attached a new revision of the patch. Please comment, and let me know
whether its OK to add or still sth. wrong.
thanks,
Sebastian
Alexander Hall wrote:
> On 09/12/10 18:20, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
>
>> -table *tbl = (hdr->do_err ? r->err_headers_out : r->headers_out);
>> +tab
Hi,
thanks for taking a look.
On Sunday 12 September 2010 09:33:44 pm you wrote:
> On 09/12/10 18:20, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > -table *tbl = (hdr->do_err ? r->err_headers_out : r->headers_out);
> > +table *tbl;
> > +switch (hdr->inout) {
> > +case hdrs_out:
> > + tbl =
On 09/12/10 18:20, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> -table *tbl = (hdr->do_err ? r->err_headers_out : r->headers_out);
> +table *tbl;
> +switch (hdr->inout) {
> +case hdrs_out:
> + tbl = r->headers_out;
> + break;
> +case hdrs_in:
> + tbl = r->headers_in;
> + b
Hi,
my first time I submit a patch which not goes to the ports.
I have a web based groupware port in the queue, that would benefit from
the patch below. The patch is against mod_headers.c and adds handling of
RequestHeader directive in the apache configuration, in order to
manipulate the reque
11 matches
Mail list logo
