Re: huge relayd diff needs testing

2011-05-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Ritschard
As expressed privately the diff reads fine to me and I like the idea, it compiles and runs, tentative ok pyr@ for now, but let's wait for some usage feedback a bit later this week. On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Reyk Floeter wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 08:12:43PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:

Re: huge relayd diff needs testing

2011-05-06 Thread Reyk Floeter
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 08:12:43PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote: > hi, > > the following diff needs some serious testing in existing setups. > it does not add any new features... > > ...but it reorganizes, shuffles, and changes the relayd code and > internal APIs and it introduces an privsep API tha