On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 03:31:12PM +0200, Renaud Allard wrote:
> On 1/16/19 19:09, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 01:25:25PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > On 2019/01/04 08:09, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 09:39:56AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On 1/16/19 19:09, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 01:25:25PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2019/01/04 08:09, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 09:39:56AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Very little feedback so far. This diff can only give me valid feedback
if the cov
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 08:41:57AM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello Otto,
>
> I gave it a try with firefox. according to my subjective tests
> I could not spot any differences with various setting.
>
> I've decided to try with some memory benchmarks I could find on github [1]. I
> did c
Hello Otto,
I gave it a try with firefox. according to my subjective tests
I could not spot any differences with various setting.
I've decided to try with some memory benchmarks I could find on github [1]. I
did create a fork [2] with my own test runner to try out your diff. To run it
just do som
On 2019/01/16 19:09, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 01:25:25PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > On 2019/01/04 08:09, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 09:39:56AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Very little feedback so far. This diff can only
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 01:25:25PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019/01/04 08:09, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 09:39:56AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Very little feedback so far. This diff can only give me valid feedback
> > > if the coverage of systems
On 2019/01/04 08:09, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 09:39:56AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> >
> > Very little feedback so far. This diff can only give me valid feedback
> > if the coverage of systems and use cases is wide. If I do not get
> > more feedback, I have to base my d
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 09:39:56AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> Very little feedback so far. This diff can only give me valid feedback
> if the coverage of systems and use cases is wide. If I do not get
> more feedback, I have to base my decisions on my own testing, which
> will benefit my sy
Very little feedback so far. This diff can only give me valid feedback
if the coverage of systems and use cases is wide. If I do not get
more feedback, I have to base my decisions on my own testing, which
will benefit my systems and use cases, but might harm yours.
So, ladies and gentlemen, sta
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:52:03AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This diff implements a more flexible approach for the number of pools
> malloc uses in the multi-threaded case. At the momemt I do not intend
> to commit this as-is, I first need this to get some feedback on what
> the prope
Hi,
This diff implements a more flexible approach for the number of pools
malloc uses in the multi-threaded case. At the momemt I do not intend
to commit this as-is, I first need this to get some feedback on what
the proper default should be.
Currently the number of pools is fixed at 4. More pool
11 matches
Mail list logo
