Very little feedback so far. This diff can only give me valid feedback
if the coverage of systems and use cases is wide.  If I do not get
more feedback, I have to base my decisions on my own testing, which
will benefit my systems and use cases, but might harm yours.

So, ladies and gentlemen, start your tests!

        -Otto


On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:20:19AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:52:03AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This diff implements a more flexible approach for the number of pools
> > malloc uses in the multi-threaded case. At the momemt I do not intend
> > to commit this as-is, I first need this to get some feedback on what
> > the proper default should be.
> > 
> > Currently the number of pools is fixed at 4. More pools mean less
> > contention for allocations, but free becomes more expensive since a
> > thread might need to check other pools increasing contention.
> > 
> > I'd like to know how this diff behaves using your favorite
> > mutli-threaded application. Often this will be a web-browser I guess.
> > 
> > Test instructions:
> > 
> > 0. Make sure you are running current.
> > 
> > 1. Do a baseline test of your application.
> > 
> > 2. Apply diff, build and install userland.
> > 
> > 3. Run your test application with MALLOC_OPTIONS=value, where value is: 
> > "", +, -, ++, -- and +++.
> > 
> > e.g. 
> > 
> >     MALLOC_OPTIONS=++ chrome
> > 
> > Note performance. Do multiple tests to get better statistics.
> > 
> > If you're not able to do full tests, at least general observations are
> > welcome. Tell a bit about the system you tested on (e.g. number of
> > cores). Note that due to randomization, different runs might show
> > different performance numbers since the pools shared by subsets of
> > threads can turn out differently.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> >     -Otto
> 
> New diff with problem noted by  Janne Johansson fixed.
> 
> Index: include/thread_private.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/include/thread_private.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.33
> diff -u -p -r1.33 thread_private.h
> --- include/thread_private.h  5 Dec 2017 13:45:31 -0000       1.33
> +++ include/thread_private.h  19 Dec 2018 10:18:38 -0000
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>  
>  #include <stdio.h>           /* for FILE and __isthreaded */
>  
> -#define _MALLOC_MUTEXES 4
> +#define _MALLOC_MUTEXES 32
>  void _malloc_init(int);
>  #ifdef __LIBC__
>  PROTO_NORMAL(_malloc_init);
> Index: stdlib/malloc.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.257
> diff -u -p -r1.257 malloc.c
> --- stdlib/malloc.c   10 Dec 2018 07:57:49 -0000      1.257
> +++ stdlib/malloc.c   19 Dec 2018 10:18:38 -0000
> @@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ struct dir_info {
>       size_t cheap_reallocs;
>       size_t malloc_used;             /* bytes allocated */
>       size_t malloc_guarded;          /* bytes used for guards */
> +     size_t pool_searches;           /* searches for pool */
> +     size_t other_pool;              /* searches in other pool */
>  #define STATS_ADD(x,y)       ((x) += (y))
>  #define STATS_SUB(x,y)       ((x) -= (y))
>  #define STATS_INC(x) ((x)++)
> @@ -179,7 +181,9 @@ struct chunk_info {
>  };
>  
>  struct malloc_readonly {
> -     struct dir_info *malloc_pool[_MALLOC_MUTEXES];  /* Main bookkeeping 
> information */
> +                                     /* Main bookkeeping information */
> +     struct dir_info *malloc_pool[_MALLOC_MUTEXES];
> +     u_int   malloc_mutexes;         /* how much in actual use? */
>       int     malloc_mt;              /* multi-threaded mode? */
>       int     malloc_freecheck;       /* Extensive double free check */
>       int     malloc_freeunmap;       /* mprotect free pages PROT_NONE? */
> @@ -267,7 +271,7 @@ getpool(void)
>               return mopts.malloc_pool[0];
>       else
>               return mopts.malloc_pool[TIB_GET()->tib_tid &
> -                 (_MALLOC_MUTEXES - 1)];
> +                 (mopts.malloc_mutexes - 1)];
>  }
>  
>  static __dead void
> @@ -316,6 +320,16 @@ static void
>  omalloc_parseopt(char opt)
>  {
>       switch (opt) {
> +     case '+':
> +             mopts.malloc_mutexes <<= 1;
> +             if (mopts.malloc_mutexes > _MALLOC_MUTEXES)
> +                     mopts.malloc_mutexes = _MALLOC_MUTEXES;
> +             break;
> +     case '-':
> +             mopts.malloc_mutexes >>= 1;
> +             if (mopts.malloc_mutexes < 1)
> +                     mopts.malloc_mutexes = 1;
> +             break;
>       case '>':
>               mopts.malloc_cache <<= 1;
>               if (mopts.malloc_cache > MALLOC_MAXCACHE)
> @@ -395,6 +409,7 @@ omalloc_init(void)
>       /*
>        * Default options
>        */
> +     mopts.malloc_mutexes = 4;
>       mopts.malloc_junk = 1;
>       mopts.malloc_cache = MALLOC_DEFAULT_CACHE;
>  
> @@ -485,7 +500,7 @@ omalloc_poolinit(struct dir_info **dp)
>               for (j = 0; j < MALLOC_CHUNK_LISTS; j++)
>                       LIST_INIT(&d->chunk_dir[i][j]);
>       }
> -     STATS_ADD(d->malloc_used, regioninfo_size);
> +     STATS_ADD(d->malloc_used, regioninfo_size + 3 * MALLOC_PAGESIZE);
>       d->canary1 = mopts.malloc_canary ^ (u_int32_t)(uintptr_t)d;
>       d->canary2 = ~d->canary1;
>  
> @@ -1196,7 +1211,7 @@ _malloc_init(int from_rthreads)
>       if (!mopts.malloc_canary)
>               omalloc_init();
>  
> -     max = from_rthreads ? _MALLOC_MUTEXES : 1;
> +     max = from_rthreads ? mopts.malloc_mutexes : 1;
>       if (((uintptr_t)&malloc_readonly & MALLOC_PAGEMASK) == 0)
>               mprotect(&malloc_readonly, sizeof(malloc_readonly),
>                   PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
> @@ -1281,16 +1296,19 @@ findpool(void *p, struct dir_info *argpo
>       struct dir_info *pool = argpool;
>       struct region_info *r = find(pool, p);
>  
> +     STATS_INC(pool->pool_searches);
>       if (r == NULL) {
>               if (mopts.malloc_mt)  {
>                       int i;
>  
> -                     for (i = 0; i < _MALLOC_MUTEXES; i++) {
> -                             if (i == argpool->mutex)
> -                                     continue;
> +                     STATS_INC(pool->other_pool);
> +                     for (i = 1; i < mopts.malloc_mutexes; i++) {
> +                             int j = (argpool->mutex + i) &
> +                                 (mopts.malloc_mutexes - 1);
> +
>                               pool->active--;
>                               _MALLOC_UNLOCK(pool->mutex);
> -                             pool = mopts.malloc_pool[i];
> +                             pool = mopts.malloc_pool[j];
>                               _MALLOC_LOCK(pool->mutex);
>                               pool->active++;
>                               r = find(pool, p);
> @@ -2220,14 +2238,13 @@ malloc_dump1(int fd, int poolno, struct 
>               return;
>       dprintf(fd, "Region slots free %zu/%zu\n",
>               d->regions_free, d->regions_total);
> -     dprintf(fd, "Finds %zu/%zu\n", d->finds,
> -         d->find_collisions);
> -     dprintf(fd, "Inserts %zu/%zu\n", d->inserts,
> -         d->insert_collisions);
> -     dprintf(fd, "Deletes %zu/%zu\n", d->deletes,
> -         d->delete_moves);
> +     dprintf(fd, "Finds %zu/%zu\n", d->finds, d->find_collisions);
> +     dprintf(fd, "Inserts %zu/%zu\n", d->inserts, d->insert_collisions);
> +     dprintf(fd, "Deletes %zu/%zu\n", d->deletes, d->delete_moves);
>       dprintf(fd, "Cheap reallocs %zu/%zu\n",
>           d->cheap_reallocs, d->cheap_realloc_tries);
> +     dprintf(fd, "Other pool searches %zu/%zu\n",
> +         d->other_pool, d->pool_searches);
>       dprintf(fd, "In use %zu\n", d->malloc_used);
>       dprintf(fd, "Guarded %zu\n", d->malloc_guarded);
>       dump_free_chunk_info(fd, d);
> @@ -2289,7 +2306,7 @@ malloc_gdump(int fd)
>       int i;
>       int saved_errno = errno;
>  
> -     for (i = 0; i < _MALLOC_MUTEXES; i++)
> +     for (i = 0; i < mopts.malloc_mutexes; i++)
>               malloc_dump(fd, i, mopts.malloc_pool[i]);
>  
>       errno = saved_errno;
> @@ -2305,15 +2322,15 @@ malloc_exit(void)
>       if (fd != -1) {
>               dprintf(fd, "******** Start dump %s *******\n", __progname);
>               dprintf(fd,
> -                 "MT=%d I=%d F=%d U=%d J=%d R=%d X=%d C=%d cache=%u G=%zu\n",
> -                 mopts.malloc_mt, mopts.internal_funcs,
> -                 mopts.malloc_freecheck,
> +                 "MT=%d M=%u I=%d F=%d U=%d J=%d R=%d X=%d C=%d cache=%u 
> G=%zu\n",
> +                 mopts.malloc_mt, mopts.mallloc_mutexes,
> +                 mopts.internal_funcs, mopts.malloc_freecheck,
>                   mopts.malloc_freeunmap, mopts.malloc_junk,
>                   mopts.malloc_realloc, mopts.malloc_xmalloc,
>                   mopts.chunk_canaries, mopts.malloc_cache,
>                   mopts.malloc_guard);
>  
> -             for (i = 0; i < _MALLOC_MUTEXES; i++)
> +             for (i = 0; i < mopts.malloc_mutexes; i++)
>                       malloc_dump(fd, i, mopts.malloc_pool[i]);
>               dprintf(fd, "******** End dump %s *******\n", __progname);
>               close(fd);
> Index: thread/rthread_libc.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/thread/rthread_libc.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.2
> diff -u -p -r1.2 rthread_libc.c
> --- thread/rthread_libc.c     5 Sep 2017 02:40:54 -0000       1.2
> +++ thread/rthread_libc.c     19 Dec 2018 10:18:38 -0000
> @@ -169,14 +169,70 @@ static struct pthread_mutex malloc_lock[
>       MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(0),
>       MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(1),
>       MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(2),
> -     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(3)
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(3),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(4),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(5),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(6),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(7),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(8),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(9),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(10),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(11),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(12),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(13),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(14),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(15),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(16),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(17),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(18),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(19),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(20),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(21),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(22),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(23),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(24),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(25),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(26),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(27),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(28),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(29),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(30),
> +     MALLOC_LOCK_INITIALIZER(31)
>  };
>  
>  static pthread_mutex_t malloc_mutex[_MALLOC_MUTEXES] = {
>       &malloc_lock[0],
>       &malloc_lock[1],
>       &malloc_lock[2],
> -     &malloc_lock[3]
> +     &malloc_lock[3],
> +     &malloc_lock[4],
> +     &malloc_lock[5],
> +     &malloc_lock[6],
> +     &malloc_lock[7],
> +     &malloc_lock[8],
> +     &malloc_lock[9],
> +     &malloc_lock[10],
> +     &malloc_lock[11],
> +     &malloc_lock[12],
> +     &malloc_lock[13],
> +     &malloc_lock[14],
> +     &malloc_lock[15],
> +     &malloc_lock[16],
> +     &malloc_lock[17],
> +     &malloc_lock[18],
> +     &malloc_lock[19],
> +     &malloc_lock[20],
> +     &malloc_lock[21],
> +     &malloc_lock[22],
> +     &malloc_lock[23],
> +     &malloc_lock[24],
> +     &malloc_lock[25],
> +     &malloc_lock[26],
> +     &malloc_lock[27],
> +     &malloc_lock[28],
> +     &malloc_lock[29],
> +     &malloc_lock[30],
> +     &malloc_lock[31]
>  };
>  
>  void
> 

Reply via email to