On 28 May 2014 13:36, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 28/05/14(Wed) 09:30, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>> Martin Pieuchot writes:
>>
>> > Diff below replace in_iawithaddr() + in_broadcast() -> ifa_ifwithaddr(),
>> > that does the same for IPv4 since broadcast addresses are added to the
>> > tree.
Martin Pieuchot writes:
> On 28/05/14(Wed) 09:30, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>> Martin Pieuchot writes:
>>
>> > Diff below replace in_iawithaddr() + in_broadcast() -> ifa_ifwithaddr(),
>> > that does the same for IPv4 since broadcast addresses are added to the
>> > tree.
>>
>> This preven
On 28/05/14(Wed) 09:30, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> Martin Pieuchot writes:
>
> > Diff below replace in_iawithaddr() + in_broadcast() -> ifa_ifwithaddr(),
> > that does the same for IPv4 since broadcast addresses are added to the
> > tree.
>
> This prevents listeners to bind on 255.255.255
Martin Pieuchot writes:
> Diff below replace in_iawithaddr() + in_broadcast() -> ifa_ifwithaddr(),
> that does the same for IPv4 since broadcast addresses are added to the
> tree.
This prevents listeners to bind on 255.255.255.255, something allowed
with the current code. Thoughts?
> ok?
>
> I
Diff below replace in_iawithaddr() + in_broadcast() -> ifa_ifwithaddr(),
that does the same for IPv4 since broadcast addresses are added to the
tree.
ok?
Index: netinet/raw_ip.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netinet/raw_ip.c,v
ret