Martin Pieuchot <mpieuc...@nolizard.org> writes:
> Diff below replace in_iawithaddr() + in_broadcast() -> ifa_ifwithaddr(),
> that does the same for IPv4 since broadcast addresses are added to the
> tree.
This prevents listeners to bind on 255.255.255.255, something allowed
with the current code. Thoughts?
> ok?
>
> Index: netinet/raw_ip.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netinet/raw_ip.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.72
> diff -u -p -r1.72 raw_ip.c
> --- netinet/raw_ip.c 21 Apr 2014 12:22:26 -0000 1.72
> +++ netinet/raw_ip.c 27 May 2014 11:02:45 -0000
> @@ -465,9 +465,8 @@ rip_usrreq(struct socket *so, int req, s
> break;
> }
> if (!((so->so_options & SO_BINDANY) ||
> - addr->sin_addr.s_addr == 0 ||
> - in_iawithaddr(addr->sin_addr, inp->inp_rtableid) ||
> - in_broadcast(addr->sin_addr, NULL, inp->inp_rtableid))) {
> + addr->sin_addr.s_addr == INADDR_ANY ||
> + ifa_ifwithaddr(sintosa(addr), inp->inp_rtableid))) {
> error = EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> break;
> }
>
--
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
