On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 01:45:05AM -0500, Michael McConville wrote:
> Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > 2016-01-22 23:18 GMT+03:00 Martijn van Duren
> > :
> > > 5) 5_vi_remove_v_strdup.diff: Use strdup instead of v_strdup.
> >
> > Not okay: MALLOC macro prints information message to user, while
> > patched
Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 2016-01-22 23:18 GMT+03:00 Martijn van Duren
> :
> > 5) 5_vi_remove_v_strdup.diff: Use strdup instead of v_strdup.
>
> Not okay: MALLOC macro prints information message to user, while
> patched version isn't. I think refactoring shouldn't have such visible
> impact on functi
from part 3:
> diff --git cl/cl_main.c cl/cl_main.c
> index ed4abda..cc48ad3 100644
> --- cl/cl_main.c
> +++ cl/cl_main.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> +#include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> @@ -36,7 +37,7 @@ sigset_t __sigblockset;
ping
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:54:55PM +0100, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this diff adds client side certificate checks to httpd. Most parts
> are straight forward. But, to transfer the whole certificate
> authority store to the server process through the imsg infrastructure
> I had to change
Firefox makes a lot of concurrent malloc(3) calls. The locking to
make malloc(3) thread-safe is a bit...suboptimal. This diff makes
things better by using a mutex instead of spinlock. If you're running
Firefox you want to try it; it makes video watchable on some machines.
If you're not running F
2016-01-22 23:18 GMT+03:00 Martijn van Duren :
> Hello tech@,
>
> Attached are 6 patches to do some initial cleanup in vi (these complement
> the perr patch that got comitted earlier). They are intended to be applied
> in sequential order, because there may be slight overlap, but they (almost)
> al
Hi,
the hypervisor mode, which virtualization-enabled boards might boot in,
is basically a privilege level above the usual SVC mode the kernel is
running in. It does not support the full instruction set and we, as
a "guest" OS, need to step down and run in SVC. Otherwise we crash
really early on
Hello tech@,
Attached are 6 patches to do some initial cleanup in vi (these
complement the perr patch that got comitted earlier). They are intended
to be applied in sequential order, because there may be slight overlap,
but they (almost) all do more or less the same thing: Remove custom code
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:47:09AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 22/01/16(Fri) 08:42, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > As there isn't any consensus for one of the other solutions, I am going to
> > commit the patch that fixes this inside vio(4).
>
> I think that you should commit the diff that does
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:35:43PM +, Craig Skinner wrote:
> On 2016-01-22 Fri 13:50 PM |, Peter Kane wrote:
> > Hi Craig
> >
> > I don't want to file this as a bug but I think New Plymouth Anniversary Day
> > would be better described as Taranaki Anniversay Day. I've never seen it
> > descr
The following diff prevents integer truncation of uio_resid
by using ulmin() instead of min() and calls uiomove() instead
of the legacy uiomove().
That's straightforward because the m_len mbuf field is unsigned.
mlen can be turned to a size_t because it's set to MLEN or MCLBYTES,
which is > 0.
I
Hi,
ARM(v7) has gained two new processor modes: Hyp and Monitor.
The Hyp mode is especially interesting as it is part of the
Virtualization Extensions. On boards that support it, the
kernel is usually booted in HYP mode.
Currently HYP mode is not handled, which means that
virtualization-enabled
Martin Natano wrote:
> Below is a diff to convert videoread() to use uiomove() instead of
> uiomovei(). Note, that passing sc_fsize to ulmin() is not problematic,
> even though it is an int, because the value is always positive.
Yes, sc_fsize *should* always be positive. I had to convince myself
t
Oh goodness. My recollection is that 1 byte per character is assumed all
over the place. This is going to take a *while* to test properly.
Maybe this is a good time for me to start looking at mg again...
On Thursday, 21 January 2016, Mark Lumsden wrote:
> I am busy for the next month or so, but
On 2016-01-22 Fri 13:50 PM |, Peter Kane wrote:
> Hi Craig
>
> I don't want to file this as a bug but I think New Plymouth Anniversary Day
> would be better described as Taranaki Anniversay Day. I've never seen it
> described as anything else on a New Zealand calendar (especially while living
>
On 22/01/16(Fri) 08:42, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> As there isn't any consensus for one of the other solutions, I am going to
> commit the patch that fixes this inside vio(4).
I think that you should commit the diff that does it unconditionally.
If people are concerned about the supplementary cycle
16 matches
Mail list logo