What's their hangup with %n? We normally don't like polluting the world
with #ifdef OPENSSL_NO_PERCENT_N... We normally nuke stuff like that
On 2 May 2014 16:19, "enh" wrote:
> i maintain Android's C library which, as you may know, contains a lot
> of OpenBSD code. i've been working to clean up
* Kenneth Westerback [2014-05-02 22:14]:
> On 2 May 2014 16:08, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> > Well, I think -inet6 would be a good default, but I think there's more
> > to it. Enabling net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv should still get me a
> > link-local address (and, if router advertisements are present o
Henning Brauer writes:
> * Paul de Weerd [2014-05-02 21:20]:
>> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:53:08PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> [connectivity via link-local]
>> | Not really, I'm puzzled by your question. It works and has always
>> | worked but I shouldn't expect them to work...
>>
Paul de Weerd writes:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:53:08PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> | > | What's a regular OpenBSD host with no IPv6? I'd assume that it is
> | > | a host that can perform IPv6 connections to ::1 / localhost and reach
> | > | its neighbors through link-local addre
On 2 May 2014 16:25, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Kenneth Westerback
> wrote:
>>
>> -inet6 as the default seems more OpenBSD'ish to me. Everything off
>> that can be off, but not more.
>
>
> "That is not off which can eternal lie,
> And with strange aeons even inet4 ma
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
>
> -inet6 as the default seems more OpenBSD'ish to me. Everything off
> that can be off, but not more.
>
"That is not off which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even inet4 may die."
On 2 May 2014 16:08, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:59:09PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> | * Paul de Weerd [2014-05-02 21:20]:
> | > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:53:08PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> | [connectivity via link-local]
> | > | Not really, I'm puzzled by
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:59:09PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
| * Paul de Weerd [2014-05-02 21:20]:
| > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:53:08PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
| [connectivity via link-local]
| > | Not really, I'm puzzled by your question. It works and has always
| > | worked
* Paul de Weerd [2014-05-02 21:20]:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:53:08PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
[connectivity via link-local]
> | Not really, I'm puzzled by your question. It works and has always
> | worked but I shouldn't expect them to work...
> I'm puzzled by the fact it has al
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:53:08PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
| > | What's a regular OpenBSD host with no IPv6? I'd assume that it is
| > | a host that can perform IPv6 connections to ::1 / localhost and reach
| > | its neighbors through link-local addresses.
| >
| > Why would you expe
A recently added -F option to the nc (netcat) command to pass a
connected file descriptor to stdout only works for the listen mode
when it passes the accepted descriptor.
The patch below makes -F universal. When given it makes nc to always
pass the socket to stdout rather than performing the copy
Le 2014-05-02 13:19, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas a écrit :
> Some bugs:
> - https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12398
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xcb/6973
> - https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8503
>
> Links with more information:
> - http://fedoraproject.org
As somone who has paid out of his own pocket for ARIN access to
allocate v6 space for things, I can assure you I am not anti-v6.
What I am is
anti-I-am-a-v6-zealot-and-submit-diffs-with-no-thought-to-how-everyone-but-my-own-setup-works-and-because-I-am-a-zealot-I-am-right-until-proven-wrong.
No.
On 2 May 2014 13:24, Bob Beck wrote:
> Honestly folks, I'm sick of the attitude of "The future is nigh, the
> mystic portal awaits! V6 is coming!" as an excuse for
> we *MUST* change things related to this.
>
> We've been hearing the mystic portal awaits for 15 years - and yet
> MANY of us in MANY
Honestly folks, I'm sick of the attitude of "The future is nigh, the
mystic portal awaits! V6 is coming!" as an excuse for
we *MUST* change things related to this.
We've been hearing the mystic portal awaits for 15 years - and yet
MANY of us in MANY parts of the world still can not
get reasonable
j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) writes:
> Simon Perreault writes:
[...]
>> Has this caused any real-world problems?
>
> All the examples I've listed above are cases where programs that used no
> hints will now fail. I think they're valid, real-world cases.
Some bugs:
- https://sour
Paul de Weerd writes:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 05:35:13PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> | > If you're running on a host without IPv6, why would you want
> | > getaddrinfo() to return any IPv6 results? What good would it do to you?
> |
> | What's a regular OpenBSD host with no IPv6?
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 05:35:13PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
| > If you're running on a host without IPv6, why would you want
| > getaddrinfo() to return any IPv6 results? What good would it do to you?
|
| What's a regular OpenBSD host with no IPv6? I'd assume that it is
| a host tha
I think I have already addressed all your points below, no need to
rehash endlessly. I'll let others chime in.
I'm still very interested in any real-world problems this might have caused.
Simon
Le 2014-05-02 11:35, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas a écrit :
> Simon Perreault writes:
>
>> Le 2014-05-02
Simon Perreault writes:
> Le 2014-05-02 10:48, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas a écrit :
>> Let's say you have a machine with no IPv6 address configured (or rather,
>> only link-local addresses configured and ::1 on lo0). With the
>> AI_ADDRCONFIG flag (either set explicitely or assumed if the caller
>>
Le 2014-05-02 10:48, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas a écrit :
> Let's say you have a machine with no IPv6 address configured (or rather,
> only link-local addresses configured and ::1 on lo0). With the
> AI_ADDRCONFIG flag (either set explicitely or assumed if the caller
> passes no hints structure):
>
Simon Perreault writes:
> Le 2014-05-02 04:13, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas a écrit :
>> I don't like AI_ADDRCONFIG. It's useless as specified, and making it
>> useful requires interpretations and deviations.
>
> Can you justify this? Sounds to me like a blanket statement as it is.
Didn't you need
Le 2014-05-02 04:13, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas a écrit :
> I don't like AI_ADDRCONFIG. It's useless as specified, and making it
> useful requires interpretations and deviations.
Can you justify this? Sounds to me like a blanket statement as it is.
> My understanding is that its goal is to solve a
Henning Brauer writes:
> I don't think that kind of stuff has any place in our tree whatsoever.
> everybody inserting such "hints" for his/her favorite editor...?
All other occurrences of 'Local Variables' in the base tree were in
source imported from elsewhere or in autoconf-produced files. No
I don't think that kind of stuff has any place in our tree whatsoever.
everybody inserting such "hints" for his/her favorite editor...?
* Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas [2014-05-02 12:11]:
>
> This one is bugging me each time I start my Emacs session (because Emacs
> now asks confirmation for most var
On 2 May 2014 12:09, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>
> This one is bugging me each time I start my Emacs session (because Emacs
> now asks confirmation for most variables). This one would be useful
> only with hilit19.el (obsolete) from editors/emacs21... if the size of
> the file was actually
This one is bugging me each time I start my Emacs session (because Emacs
now asks confirmation for most variables). This one would be useful
only with hilit19.el (obsolete) from editors/emacs21... if the size of
the file was actually under 12 bytes (it's not anymore).
ok to kill it?
Index:
> From: j...@wxcvbn.org (=?utf-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9mie_Courr=C3=A8ges-Anglas?=)
> Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 10:17:45 +0200
>
> I don't know when this changed, but the information below seems no
> longer relevant.
>
> ok?
Kill it!
> Index: intro.2
> ===
I don't know when this changed, but the information below seems no
longer relevant.
ok?
Index: intro.2
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/sys/intro.2,v
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -p -p -u -r1.48 intro.2
--- intro.2 21 Jan 201
Hi,
I don't like AI_ADDRCONFIG. It's useless as specified, and making it
useful requires interpretations and deviations.
My understanding is that its goal is to solve a real world problem,
as in avoiding useless and potentially harmful DNS requests. So why not
make it do that, and just that?
30 matches
Mail list logo
