On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 06:37 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 06:15:06AM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 05:42 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > Here is more cleanup.
> > >
> > > Kill the MKget MKfree madness and replace it with *drummrolls*
> > > a p
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 06:15:06AM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 05:42 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > Here is more cleanup.
> >
> > Kill the MKget MKfree madness and replace it with *drummrolls*
> > a pool(9). Makes the code a lot easier to digest.
> >
Better?
--
:wq
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 05:42 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Here is more cleanup.
>
> Kill the MKget MKfree madness and replace it with *drummrolls*
> a pool(9). Makes the code a lot easier to digest.
>
> --
> :wq Claudio
>
> Index: net/radix.c
>
send_packet() sends packets out a raw socket unless the destination is
INADDR_BROADCAST, in which case it sends the packet out via bpf.
Ken
On 19 Jan 2014 17:33, "Brad Smith" wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 04:10:21AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:57:26PM -0500
Here is more cleanup.
Kill the MKget MKfree madness and replace it with *drummrolls*
a pool(9). Makes the code a lot easier to digest.
--
:wq Claudio
Index: net/radix.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/radix.c,v
retrieving revision 1
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 04:10:21AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:57:26PM -0500, Brad wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> > > The default PF ruleset as setup by rc is too restrictive. Have the default
> > > ruleset allow for DHCPv6.
> >
This seems to make sense. ok todd@. Please get at least one other ok though.
Penned by Brad Smith on 20140118 20:57.26, we have:
| On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
| > The default PF ruleset as setup by rc is too restrictive. Have the default
| > ruleset all
On 19 January 2014 16:35, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> We no longer use radix.c in userland since routed(8) was killed
> aeons ago. There is no need for this madness anymore so remove it.
OK
We no longer use radix.c in userland since routed(8) was killed
aeons ago. There is no need for this madness anymore so remove it.
--
:wq Claudio
Index: radix.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/radix.c,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:57:26PM -0500, Brad wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> > The default PF ruleset as setup by rc is too restrictive. Have the default
> > ruleset allow for DHCPv6.
>
> Anyone?
Looks good to me. OK claudio@
Question: should we add the s
On 19 January 2014 15:57, Brad Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
>> The default PF ruleset as setup by rc is too restrictive. Have the default
>> ruleset allow for DHCPv6.
>
> Anyone?
>
yes, i think this is ok.
On Jan 18, 2014, at 16:25, Sia Lang wrote:
> If the tests are as good as this project claims them to be, the process
> should take exactly one test cycle. If that's the case, then the test regime
> suck big time. Logic brother. Logic.
I don't know what tests you're referring to. OpenBSD bui
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> The default PF ruleset as setup by rc is too restrictive. Have the default
> ruleset allow for DHCPv6.
Anyone?
> Index: rc
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/src/etc/rc,v
> retri
On 19 January 2014 12:39, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Subject sais it all. One less gloabl symbol.
>
> --
> :wq Claudio
>
OK
On 19 Jan 2014, at 01.36, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> So, the 1 is the thought, and the 0 is the amount?
>
> Sorry, but your comments were so ridiculous I couldn't help it.
> Saying it's the thougth that counts to people who have
> repeated explicitly they need MONEY.
There you go again with your sim
On 18 Jan 2014, at 20.15, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Jan 18 16:29:46, m...@sci.fi wrote:
>> On 18 Jan 2014, at 04.33, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> And I hope it?s the thought that counts more than the amount.
>
> LOL, yes, especially when it comes to bills being paid.
>
You, too, sir, can also take an
On 18 Jan 2014, at 22.25, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Mike, maybe you can stop your rambling, and just do the same. Because
> otherwise, I don't understand why you feel justified to be on this mailing
> list. You were henning's roommate, so that means that you know all about
> OpenBSD, programming,
Subject sais it all. One less gloabl symbol.
--
:wq Claudio
Index: kern/uipc_domain.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/uipc_domain.c,v
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -p -r1.33 uipc_domain.c
--- kern/uipc_domain.c 20 Aug 2013 09:14
Hi tech,
this diff changes the readpassphrase call to be more like described in the
manpage.
On the users site "readpassphrase" doesn't really show what the problem is.
On the developers site the flag 0 is not described in the manpage.
Regards,
Fritjof
Index: signify.c
=
As done in IPv6 land report how many packets are dropped because we hit
the rate limiter (net.inet.icmp.errppslimit). On bigger routers it may be
needed to tune that value up in case to many packets are dropped.
OK?
--
:wq Claudio
Index: sys/netinet/icmp_var.h
===
Theo de Raadt schrieb am Sat, 18. Jan 15:42:
> > > this page does not need an EXAMPLES section.
> > > jmc
> > What are the criteria to add an EXAMPLES section to a manpage?
>
> Examples should cover either "slightly non-obvious but powerful" usage
> cases that are not entirely expected, and thus
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 03:42:50PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > this page does not need an EXAMPLES section.
> > > jmc
> > What are the criteria to add an EXAMPLES section to a manpage?
>
> Examples should cover either "slightly non-obvious but powerful" usage
> cases that are not entirely ex
> > this page does not need an EXAMPLES section.
> > jmc
> What are the criteria to add an EXAMPLES section to a manpage?
Examples should cover either "slightly non-obvious but powerful" usage
cases that are not entirely expected, and thus lead people to seeing
the power of the command.
An exampl
Theo de Raadt schrieb am Sat, 18. Jan 15:02:
> > I have added some examples to the fw_update manpage, to show how you
> > can install, update or delete a firmware package. It tooks a little
> > while until I figured out how fw_update works, so maybe it can help
> > the next one.
>
> You sure did
Jason McIntyre schrieb am Sat, 18. Jan 21:56:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:28:18PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> > Hi tech,
> >
> > I have added some examples to the fw_update manpage, to show how you can
> > install, update or delete a firmware package.
> > It tooks a little while until I
> > The old hardware would still run while they're validating the emulators,
> > and that process would probably take a really long time.
> >
>
> If the tests are as good as this project claims them to be, the process
> should take exactly one test cycle. If that's the case, then the test
> regime
> I have added some examples to the fw_update manpage, to show how you
> can install, update or delete a firmware package. It tooks a little
> while until I figured out how fw_update works, so maybe it can help
> the next one.
You sure did spot a real problem in the man page, which is that it
doe
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:28:18PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> Hi tech,
>
> I have added some examples to the fw_update manpage, to show how you can
> install, update or delete a firmware package.
> It tooks a little while until I figured out how fw_update works, so maybe it
> can help th
Perhaps something like this? Only compile-tested.
- todd
Index: usr.sbin/lpr/lpd/printjob.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/openbsd/src/usr.sbin/lpr/lpd/printjob.c,v
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u -r1.49 printjob.c
--- usr.sbin/lpr/lpd/p
Hi tech,
I have added some examples to the fw_update manpage, to show how you can
install, update or delete a firmware package.
It tooks a little while until I figured out how fw_update works, so maybe it
can help the next one.
Regards,
Fritjof
Index: fw_update.1
==
this gets rid of NO_CCB in vdsk. it considers space on the tx ring
as the resource the iopool is managing, but gated by the availability
of the service domain. it takes advantage of the newly available
scsi_iopool_run() interface to restart io when the domain providing
a disk comes back.
is anyone
MJ [m...@sci.fi] wrote:
>
> On 18 Jan 2014, at 04.33, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >
> > Why is there this effort to convince us to do less?
> >
>
> I do not propagate such a train of thought; only said that if you want
> corporate funding then be prepared to detail your costs and justify each and
Some time ago I proposed a diff to allow pflow(4) to determine the src IP
address based on the route table if flowsrc was not specified. That diff
was not accepted because having multiple places look up route tables is
undesirable.
Since then henning@ moved UDP checksum calcs into ip_output. That
On 18 Jan 2014, at 04.33, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> Why is there this effort to convince us to do less?
>
I do not propagate such a train of thought; only said that if you want
corporate funding then be prepared to detail your costs and justify each and
every one of them as well as satisfying
Hi,
back in OpenBSD 5.0 times, there was a merge with NetBSD's libedit. It
was supposed to retain local modifications, but unfortunately they got
lost. In el.c, they got reintroduced with revision 1.18, but the
following ones are still lost:
history.c: revision 1.13
term.c: revision 1.13
Tobi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:39:49PM -0500, sven falempin wrote:
> i read the manuals , and well , i am still unsure,
>
> if i put SIGNER=bob in the package configuration
>
> then it will be signed with
>
> /etc/signify/bob.sec
>
> having to read 4 different manual page to get this is strange :p
I notice a lot of people have suggested "use an emulator," as if that had never
occurred to the OpenBSD developers before, but nobody has volunteered to verify
that the available emulators are good enough to actually replace real hardware.
Also, I don't understand why anyone thinks emulation wou
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Brett Lymn wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 07:33:01PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>
>> What other community has users who commonly run upstream software on
>> 64-bit big-endian strict alignment platform with register windows
>> adjusting the frames in odd ways, o
Am 17.01.2014 22:14 schrieb Kevin Lyda:
That's a bug to be filed against an emulator. And it's easier to do
that *now* when the older hardware is around to test for bug
compatibility.
And how do you do that when the hardware has gone?
And I must admit the resistance to this is weird.
This a
I do not doubt that emulators can be useful for some things. Indeed, I
use them myself when real hardware isn't available.
but emulators have limits -- invariably they are written to emulate certain
things accurately (albeit imperfectly, because all programmers make
mistakes) while other things d
40 matches
Mail list logo
