Re: resizing auto-allocated labels

2011-05-21 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 09:57:54PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > I like this a lot. Can we use stronum() and avoid the manual > operator processing? Don't think so. Fractions like 0.5g would break. -Otto > > Ken > > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:01:01PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek w

Re: Making umount DUID capable

2011-05-21 Thread Lawrence Teo
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 04:17:59AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: > In the current spirit of making stuff DUID capable i found that > umount(8) was still not so. > > Diff makes use of "unrawname()" from fsck/fsutils.[ch]. Not sure if > this is what and how we want it, so no man page changes included

Re: resizing auto-allocated labels

2011-05-21 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
I like this a lot. Can we use stronum() and avoid the manual operator processing? Ken On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:01:01PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > Hi, > > it is already possible to resize auto alloctaed labels using the R > command in disklabel. But a problem quite a few persons mention

Re: Add SB800+ SMBus support to piixpm.

2011-05-21 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 17:08:07 -0400 > From: Brynet > > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:32:01PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 19:09:36 -0400 > > > From: Brynet > > > > > > Here it is a again with the magic relocated to piixreg.h. > > > > > > To clarify, if you have: >

Re: Add SB800+ SMBus support to piixpm.

2011-05-21 Thread Brynet
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:32:01PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 19:09:36 -0400 > > From: Brynet > > > > Here it is a again with the magic relocated to piixreg.h. > > > > To clarify, if you have: > > piixpm0 at pci0 dev 20 function 0 "ATI SBx00 SMBus" > > > > Then check

Re: Add SB800+ SMBus support to piixpm.

2011-05-21 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 19:09:36 -0400 > From: Brynet > > Here it is a again with the magic relocated to piixreg.h. > > To clarify, if you have: > piixpm0 at pci0 dev 20 function 0 "ATI SBx00 SMBus" > > Then check if the revision is >= 0x40, which is the relevant southbridge. > > If it works,

resizing auto-allocated labels

2011-05-21 Thread Otto Moerbeek
Hi, it is already possible to resize auto alloctaed labels using the R command in disklabel. But a problem quite a few persons mentioned is that the R command only takes a relative size currently. This changes that to allow for both absolute and relative size changes. An example session to get t

Re: set skip on

2011-05-21 Thread Theo de Raadt
> * Stuart Henderson [2011-05-19 11:21]: > > > Note that the default ruleset does include a 'set skip on lo' but > > > that's fine since lo* interfaces are by default added to the "lo" > > > group. > > > > > > If people get bitten by this change, they could either add > > > an interface-name-match

Re: AVL tree

2011-05-21 Thread Ted Unangst
On May 19, 2011, at 1:21 PM, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Thordur Bjornsson wrote: >> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:52:44PM +0300, Michael Pounov wrote: >>> Add AVL tree implementation and merge few RB tree related macros. >>> >>> If you have comments or any claims, plea

Re: AMD K10/K11 family frequency scaling.

2011-05-21 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:35:55PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 03:52:02PM -0400, Brynet wrote: > > Adds support for family 10h/11h AMD processors, not sure if it's the > > best way to do this.. but it works and noticably lowers the temperatures > > reported by the die sens