On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:38:29PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> > "Rick" == Rick Jones writes:
> Rick> Is there a version of tcpdump in the works which will decode
> Rick> the unecrypted
> Rick> portions of an SSL/TLS session? Or do I need to look
> Rick> elsewhere?
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 14:36 -0800, Ani Sinha wrote:
> >
> > It is possible to test for the presence of support of the new vlan bpf
> > extensions by attempting to load a filter that uses them. As only valid
> > filters can be loaded, old kernels that do not support filtering of vlan
> > tags will
On 12/12/2012 10:53 PM, Ani Sinha wrote:
unsigned int netdev_8021q_inskb = 1;
...
{
.ctl_name = NET_CORE_8021q_INSKB,
.procname = "netdev_8021q_inskb",
.data = &netdev_8021q_inskb,
.maxlen = siz
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Ani Sinha wrote:
> >
> > It is possible to test for the presence of support of the new vlan bpf
> > extensions by attempting to load a filter that uses them. As only valid
> > filters can be loaded, old kernels that do not support filtering of vlan
> > ta
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 12/12/2012 10:53 PM, Ani Sinha wrote:
>>>
>>> unsigned int netdev_8021q_inskb = 1;
>>>
>>> ...
>>> {
>>> .ctl_name = NET_CORE_8021q_INSKB,
>>> .procname = "netdev_8021q_inskb",
>>>
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Ani Sinha wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 12/12/2012 10:53 PM, Ani Sinha wrote:
unsigned int netdev_8021q_inskb = 1;
...
{
.ctl_name = NET_CORE_8021q_INSKB,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Daniel Borkmann
wrote:
> Well, not everyone on netdev might be following this thread (resp.
> following fully). The best way to get responses for a patch is to go
> through the normal patch submission process on netdev, and if you like
> to request for comments, t
