On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 16.06.10 14:19, Tom Gundersen ([email protected]) wrote:
>> 1) parse the DAEMONS array from /etc/rc.conf
>> 2) each daemon should be made into a service and be scheduled "After"
>> the preceding daemon in the array.
>>
>> Two excepti
On Wed, 16.06.10 14:19, Tom Gundersen ([email protected]) wrote:
> Lennart, Marius,
Heya,
> I don't know what happened with Marius' patches, so I'm submitting the
> patch I need to make my system boot (taking into account the comments
> made by Lennart).
I have merged this now. Thanks.
> With the a
Lennart, Marius,
I don't know what happened with Marius' patches, so I'm submitting the
patch I need to make my system boot (taking into account the comments
made by Lennart).
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 20.05.10 15:17, Marius O ([email protected]) wrote
On Thu, 20.05.10 15:17, Marius O ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Are you sure you have something like rc.local?
>
> Yes, Arch has it... but with the mention of having a
> rc.local.shutdown. Is there a way of defining a dependency between the
> two (ie, if we start the service responsible for rc.l
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Those service files appear to be mostly a 1:1 copy of my Fedora files
> but I am quite sure that there are certain differences between Arch and
> Fedora that make some of those scripts redundant.
Yes, they were kept as basic as possible
On Wed, 19.05.10 10:00, Michael Meeks ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 00:27 +0200, Marius O wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/units/arch/halt.service
> > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> > +# This file is part of systemd.
> > +#
> > +# systemd is free software; you can redistr
On Wed, 19.05.10 00:27, Marius O ([email protected]) wrote:
Heya,
> Hello,
>
> I don't know if Arch is considered a well-known distribution, but
> here's a patch for adding a base for Arch specific services.
Oh, I think it is well-known enough, and in dubio pro reo...
> Also, how should we pro
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:00, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 00:27 +0200, Marius O wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/units/arch/halt.service
>> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
>> +# This file is part of systemd.
>> +#
>> +# systemd is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>
>
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 00:27 +0200, Marius O wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/units/arch/halt.service
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +# This file is part of systemd.
> +#
> +# systemd is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
I'm a fan of the GPL & headers on code, and all that; but is
Hello,
I don't know if Arch is considered a well-known distribution, but
here's a patch for adding a base for Arch specific services.
Also, how should we proceed in regards to higher level services ?
(*DM, udev, etc)
Should they be maintained into the main tree, or sepparately ?
Regards,
-Marius
10 matches
Mail list logo
