Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/3] udev: check return value of uname.

2013-03-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:58:31PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:50:48PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Wed, 27.03.13 15:16, Vaclav Pavlin ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > > From: Václav Pavlín > > > > > > --- > > > src/udev/udevd.c | 4 +++-

[systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 200

2013-03-28 Thread Lennart Poettering
Heya, System Five Hundred has now reached Version Two Hundred, how awesome is that? Mostly bug fixes. http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-200.tar.xz CHANGES WITH 200: * The boot-time readahead implementation for rotating media will now read the read-ahead data

Re: [systemd-devel] A newbie question regarding ordering cycles

2013-03-28 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 28.03.13 13:47, Frederic Crozat ([email protected]) wrote: > Le jeudi 28 mars 2013 à 12:22 +, Belal, Awais a écrit : > > Hi Guys, > > > > Just a newbie question as I am not much familiar with systemd yet. > > While setting up a system I have systemd-195 running but some of the > > serv

Re: [systemd-devel] A newbie question regarding ordering cycles

2013-03-28 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 28.03.13 12:22, Belal, Awais ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Just a newbie question as I am not much familiar with systemd yet. While > setting up a system I have systemd-195 running but some of the services are > not launched properly. I get the following: > > systemd[1

[systemd-devel] Shared root fs by default

2013-03-28 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
Hi all, As a bit of a feedback, the change in systemd to mark root fs as recursively shared by default has the potential to bite hard anyone who builds chroot-ed environments on their system. When you build your chroot fs and then bind mount bits of the outside world into it, you are up for a

Re: [systemd-devel] A newbie question regarding ordering cycles

2013-03-28 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Belal, Awais at 28/03/13 12:22 did gyre and gimble: >> Hi Guys, >> >> Just a newbie question as I am not much familiar with systemd yet. While >> setting up a system I have systemd-195 running but some of the services >> ar

Re: [systemd-devel] A newbie question regarding ordering cycles

2013-03-28 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Belal, Awais at 28/03/13 12:22 did gyre and gimble: > Hi Guys, > > Just a newbie question as I am not much familiar with systemd yet. While > setting up a system I have systemd-195 running but some of the services > are not launched properly. I get the following: > > *systemd[1

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add test coverage and generate report with lcov

2013-03-28 Thread Thomas H.P. Andersen
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 05.02.13 23:56, Thomas H.P. Andersen ([email protected]) wrote: > >> Adds test coverage and generates html reports. Configure with >> --enable-coverage and run make lcov. >> >> make lcov-upload exists but it currently just rsyncs

Re: [systemd-devel] A newbie question regarding ordering cycles

2013-03-28 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le jeudi 28 mars 2013 à 12:22 +, Belal, Awais a écrit : > Hi Guys, > > Just a newbie question as I am not much familiar with systemd yet. > While setting up a system I have systemd-195 running but some of the > services are not launched properly. I get the following: > > systemd[1]: Found ord

[systemd-devel] A newbie question regarding ordering cycles

2013-03-28 Thread Belal, Awais
Hi Guys, Just a newbie question as I am not much familiar with systemd yet. While setting up a system I have systemd-195 running but some of the services are not launched properly. I get the following: systemd[1]: Found ordering cycle on basic.target/start systemd[1]: Walked on cycle path to so