Am 30.11.2012 23:28, schrieb Khem Raj:
> I have a scenario where, I have foo.service which runs on boot and later
> bar.service runs and it has to stop
> foo.service which I achieved by declaring it as Conflicts= in the unit file
> but I would like to restart foo.service
> when bar.service is s
Hi
I have a scenario where, I have foo.service which runs on boot and later
bar.service runs and it has to stop foo.service which I achieved by
declaring it as Conflicts= in the unit file but I would like to restart
foo.service when bar.service is stopped. I have run out of ideas on how to
achieve
On Fri 30 Nov at 19:26:21 +0100 [email protected] said:
> >
> > It would be nice to at least do an overmount in cases where something
> > sane for a default could be created at boot.
>
> We obviously cannot over mount a non-existing file :) You have to
> leave it empty, then we will do that.
I suppos
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 21:49 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2012/11/30 Ramkumar Ramachandra :
> > Execute python using "/usr/bin/env python" instead of hard-coding the
>
> I'm not really a fan of using /usr/bin/env, as you can pick up a
> random python version depending on how your PATH is setup.
>
2012/11/30 Ramkumar Ramachandra :
> Execute python using "/usr/bin/env python" instead of hard-coding the
I'm not really a fan of using /usr/bin/env, as you can pick up a
random python version depending on how your PATH is setup.
Besides, you need to spawn an additional binary.
I would assume that
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Timothy Pepper
wrote:
> On Fri 30 Nov at 13:58:43 +0100 [email protected] said:
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
>> wrote:
>> > Kay Sievers wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> It'
On Fri 30 Nov at 13:58:43 +0100 [email protected] said:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
> wrote:
> > Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> It'll be created by systemd during init if not present. So we _do_ a
The following tests fail if /etc/machine-id is not present:
$ ./test-id128
random: a08ea8ed34594d4bbd953dd182ec86f9
Assertion 'sd_id128_get_machine(&id) == 0' failed at
src/test/test-id128.c:41, function main(). Aborting.
[1]8017 abort (core dumped) ./test-id128
$ ./test-journal
The following tests fail if /etc/machine-id is not present:
$ ./test-id128
random: a08ea8ed34594d4bbd953dd182ec86f9
Assertion 'sd_id128_get_machine(&id) == 0' failed at
src/test/test-id128.c:41, function main(). Aborting.
[1]8017 abort (core dumped) ./test-id128
$ ./test-journal
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
>> wrote:
>>> Update the license with the copy found on
>>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.txt
>>
>> Applied.
>
> Thanks. I noticed that y
Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
> wrote:
>> Update the license with the copy found on
>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.txt
>
> Applied.
Thanks. I noticed that you dropped the signoff on all three patches.
Should I send future patches
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:47:42PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> The following tests fail if /etc/machine-id is not present:
> +if (journal_file_open("one.journal", O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0666, true,
> false, NULL, NULL, NULL, &one) == -128) {
> +printf("skipping test: /etc
Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
> wrote:
>> Where is the creation code? The systemd-machine-id-setup binary does
>> _not_ create it, and my patch proposes to fix that.
>
> We overmount an empty file if needed. We do not want to create
> anything if we do
The following tests fail if /etc/machine-id is not present:
$ ./test-id128
random: a08ea8ed34594d4bbd953dd182ec86f9
Assertion 'sd_id128_get_machine(&id) == 0' failed at
src/test/test-id128.c:41, function main(). Aborting.
[1]8017 abort (core dumped) ./test-id128
$ ./test-journal
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> Fix some minor spelling mistakes in the manpages.
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/syste
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> f33d3ec1 (move more common files to shared/ and add them to shared.la,
> 2012-04-12) moved src/hostname-setup.c to src/shared/hostname-setup.c,
> but did not update DISTRO_PORTING accordingly. Fix this.
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> Update the license with the copy found on
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.txt
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
htt
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It'll be created by systemd during init if not present. So we _do_ a
>>> kind of around.
>
> Where is the creation code? The systemd-
Kay Sievers wrote:
> It is mandatory for systemd systems. We just require it to be around,
> and do not work around it.
Specifically, which package installs /etc/machine-id? Is it a build
dependency for systemd?
Ram
___
systemd-devel mailing list
syste
Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>
>> It'll be created by systemd during init if not present. So we _do_ a
>> kind of around.
Where is the creation code? The systemd-machine-id-setup binary does
_not_ create it, and my patch proposes to f
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> It'll be created by systemd during init if not present. So we _do_ a
> kind of around. I haven't looked at the details of the patch, but
> I think that it would be nice to support testing before the first run
> with systemd: th
---
man/udevadm.xml | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/udevadm.xml b/man/udevadm.xml
index 3bd7738..7791028 100644
--- a/man/udevadm.xml
+++ b/man/udevadm.xml
@@ -429,9 +429,9 @@
--update
-Compile the hardware
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:09:01PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
> wrote:
> > Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> >> $ ./test-journal
> >> Assertion 'journal_file_open("test.journal", O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0666,
> >> true, true, NULL, NULL, NULL, &f) == 0'
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>> $ ./test-journal
>> Assertion 'journal_file_open("test.journal", O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0666,
>> true, true, NULL, NULL, NULL, &f) == 0' failed at
>> src/journal/test-journal.c:46, function main(). Aborting.
>>
'Twas brillig, and Brandon Black at 29/11/12 04:41 did gyre and gimble:
> The daemon's "fast restart" code does all of the expensive startup
> operations in the new daemon first (e.g. parsing large data input), then
> signals the existing daemon to shut itself down, waits for it to release
> its cr
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> $ ./test-journal
> Assertion 'journal_file_open("test.journal", O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0666,
> true, true, NULL, NULL, NULL, &f) == 0' failed at
> src/journal/test-journal.c:46, function main(). Aborting.
> [1]8059 abort (core dumped) ./test-journal
>
> $ ./test-journal-
/etc/machine-id does not exist on all distributions, and DBus puts its
machine-id in /var/lib/dbus/machine-id. One test in test-id128 fails
if the file isn't present. Make systemd-machine-id-setup create the
file if it doesn't exist, and fix a failing test in test-id128.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar
Execute python using "/usr/bin/env python" instead of hard-coding the
path of the Python binary.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra
---
Minor fix.
src/analyze/systemd-analyze |2 +-
src/locale/generate-kbd-model-map |2 +-
test/rule-syntax-check.py |2 +-
3 files cha
28 matches
Mail list logo
