On Mon, 03.09.12 23:46, Colin Guthrie ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
Heya,
>
> OK, so these are the changes I'd propose to fix the issues mentioned
> in this thread. I've not tested them so this is more for general
> feedback as to whether this approach is generally a good one or not.
>
> The
On Tue, 11.09.12 12:06, Tomasz Torcz ([email protected]) wrote:
> >From 0a3f3b2a46607a94efd2936ae7094a9ef7421e76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tomasz Torcz
> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:14:44 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Try to start rescue.target if default.target is missing
>
> In rare cases wh
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 11/09/12 11:37 did gyre and gimble:
>> Hi guys.
>>
>> Quick straw poll: Has anyone had issues mounting XFS partitions on boot?
>> I have a user who has several and one usually mounts fine the the others
>>
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:15:27PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 11.09.12 16:06, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> > > Yes, this seems right.
> > >
> > > Now, the question is what to do about it... I really have no nice way
> > > out here short of biting the
On Tue, 11.09.12 16:06, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Yes, this seems right.
> >
> > Now, the question is what to do about it... I really have no nice way
> > out here short of biting the bullet and adding the ability of allowing
> > configuration of shutdown ordering
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:03:31PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 11.09.12 14:14, Michel Lafon-Puyo ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> Heya,
>
> > So the simplified dependency graph I obtain is:
> >
> > remote-fs-pre.target mnt-be.automount
> > \ /
On Tue, 11.09.12 11:34, [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> IPMI watchdog hardware on servers can be configured outside the /dev/watchdog
> interface[1].
>
> It would be beneficial if systemd can first get the current timeout value
> (WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT), if not
> s
On Tue, 11.09.12 14:14, Michel Lafon-Puyo ([email protected]) wrote:
Heya,
> So the simplified dependency graph I obtain is:
>
> remote-fs-pre.target mnt-be.automount
> \ / |
> \/ |
> \ /|
>
On Mon, 10.09.12 22:42, Dave Reisner ([email protected]) wrote:
> > > Just to add to this, is there a particular reason writev was chosen?
> >
> > One atomic syscall to write this string without copying any data, that's
> > the advantage of the scatter/gather interfaces. Not that it would matte
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 11/09/12 13:12 did gyre and gimble:
> On Tue, 11.09.12 11:15, Colin Guthrie ([email protected]) wrote:
>
Yes, thanks, sleeping does help (the card under question is the second
one, i.e. with suffix '1'):
~ $ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/99-
On Tue, 11.09.12 11:15, Colin Guthrie ([email protected]) wrote:
> >> Yes, thanks, sleeping does help (the card under question is the second
> >> one, i.e. with suffix '1'):
> >>
> >> ~ $ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/99-zlocal.rules | grep alsa
> >> ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="sound", KERNEL=="control
On Mon, 10.09.12 22:45, Dave Reisner ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:42:24AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 03.09.12 17:13, Dave Reisner ([email protected]) wrote:
> >
> > > Break out the write logic into a separate function and simply use it as
> >
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 11/09/12 11:37 did gyre and gimble:
> Hi guys.
>
> Quick straw poll: Has anyone had issues mounting XFS partitions on boot?
> I have a user who has several and one usually mounts fine the the others
> do not. When in the emergency shell they all mount fine manua
Hi guys.
Quick straw poll: Has anyone had issues mounting XFS partitions on boot?
I have a user who has several and one usually mounts fine the the others
do not. When in the emergency shell they all mount fine manually.
Could there some kind of concurrency issue here? Or perhaps the first
mount
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 11/09/12 02:12 did gyre and gimble:
> On Mon, 03.09.12 14:34, Вечный Студент ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>>
>> 03.09.2012, 13:48, "Colin Guthrie" :
>>> Then you should probably try and debug this further - e.g. by rmmod'ing
>>> the module and inserting
>From 0a3f3b2a46607a94efd2936ae7094a9ef7421e76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tomasz Torcz
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:14:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Try to start rescue.target if default.target is missing
In rare cases when default.target symlink is missing, systemd fails
instantly and gets into rebo
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:34:12AM +0530, [email protected] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> IPMI watchdog hardware on servers can be configured outside the /dev/watchdog
> interface[1].
"A watchdog timer is provided that implements the Linux-standard
watchdog timer interface. "
What's wrong with ipmi
Hello,
IPMI watchdog hardware on servers can be configured outside the /dev/watchdog
interface[1].
It would be beneficial if systemd can first get the current timeout value
(WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT), if not
set, only then set it to RuntimeWatchdogSec. This would ensure that timeout
values set via oth
18 matches
Mail list logo
