On Tue, 11.09.12 14:14, Michel Lafon-Puyo ([email protected]) wrote:
Heya, > So the simplified dependency graph I obtain is: > > remote-fs-pre.target mnt-be.automount > \ / | > \ / | > \ / | > \ / | > \ / | > mnt-be.mount | > | > | > remote-fs > | > | > | > systemd-user-sessions > > > > As I understand it, there is no boot-up order between > systemd-user-sessions and mnt-be.mount so on shutdown there is a > race condition between systemd-user-sessions and mnt-be.mount. > > Is it right? Yes, this seems right. Now, the question is what to do about it... I really have no nice way out here short of biting the bullet and adding the ability of allowing configuration of shutdown ordering that is not just the inverse of the startup ordering. Then we could still allow the mount to be unordered against remote-fs at startup but order it at shutdown. Hmm, Michal, Kay, do you guys have any suggestions what we could do here? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
