2011/3/29 Lennart Poettering :
> On Tue, 29.03.11 03:36, [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote:
>> To make boot fast, it seems udev's coldplug do too much jobs -- what I
>> expect is only coldplug local block devices and tty in that stage.
>> This can save ~2s in my boot test.
>>
>> Is it pos
W dniu 29 marca 2011 21:52 użytkownik Lennart Poettering
napisał:
> On Tue, 29.03.11 21:46, Michał Piotrowski ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>> > Ah of course! Otherwise the modprobe is executed right when the last
>> > process you ran before exited...
>>
>> I do not understand why this is so.
>>
>>
On Tue, 29.03.11 21:46, Michał Piotrowski ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Ah of course! Otherwise the modprobe is executed right when the last
> > process you ran before exited...
>
> I do not understand why this is so.
>
> example I
> Type=oneshot
> ExecStart=A
> ExecStart=B
> ExecStop=C
>
> ex
W dniu 29 marca 2011 21:30 użytkownik Lennart Poettering
napisał:
> On Tue, 29.03.11 21:27, Michał Piotrowski ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>>
>> I added
>> RemainAfterExit=yes
>> and now service behaves as expected.
>
> Ah of course! Otherwise the modprobe is executed right when the last
> process
On Tue, 29.03.11 21:27, Michał Piotrowski ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> I added
> RemainAfterExit=yes
> and now service behaves as expected.
Ah of course! Otherwise the modprobe is executed right when the last
process you ran before exited...
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
___
W dniu 29 marca 2011 21:15 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> W dniu 29 marca 2011 21:07 użytkownik Lennart Poettering
> napisał:
>> On Tue, 29.03.11 21:06, Michał Piotrowski ([email protected]) wrote:
>>
>>> >> [Install]
>>> >> WantedBy=multi-user.target
>>> >>
>>> >> It works well until I
W dniu 29 marca 2011 21:07 użytkownik Lennart Poettering
napisał:
> On Tue, 29.03.11 21:06, Michał Piotrowski ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>> >> [Install]
>> >> WantedBy=multi-user.target
>> >>
>> >> It works well until I add
>> >> ExecStop=/bin/bash -c "for module in $HWMON_MODULES $BUS_MODULES;
On Tue, 29.03.11 20:59, Florian Kriener ([email protected]) wrote:
On the mailing list please keep things in English.
> On Tuesday 29 March 2011 19:41:09 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Erstell einfach /run bevor du bootest. "mkdir /run". Siehe die
> > jüngsten diskussionen auf der ML für detail
On Tuesday 29 March 2011 19:41:09 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Erstell einfach /run bevor du bootest. "mkdir /run". Siehe die
> jüngsten diskussionen auf der ML für details dazu.
Das hat zwar funktioniert sorge aber für einen anderen Fehler: / wurde
nur ro gemounted. Ich untersuche das ein anderes
On Tue, 29.03.11 21:06, Michał Piotrowski ([email protected]) wrote:
> >> [Install]
> >> WantedBy=multi-user.target
> >>
> >> It works well until I add
> >> ExecStop=/bin/bash -c "for module in $HWMON_MODULES $BUS_MODULES; do
> >> /sbin/modprobe -r $module >/dev/null 2>&1; done"
> >>
> >> Is there
W dniu 29 marca 2011 20:48 użytkownik Lennart Poettering
napisał:
> On Tue, 29.03.11 20:30, Michał Piotrowski ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've got a service
>>
>> [Unit]
>> Description=lm_sensors for monitoring motherboard sensor values
>> After=syslog.target
>>
>> [Service]
>> Envir
On Tue, 29.03.11 20:30, Michał Piotrowski ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a service
>
> [Unit]
> Description=lm_sensors for monitoring motherboard sensor values
> After=syslog.target
>
> [Service]
> EnvironmentFile=/etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors
> Type=oneshot
> ExecStart=/bin/bash -c
On Tuesday 2011-03-29 19:18, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>On Tue, 29.03.11 19:17, Jan Engelhardt ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>> >> >I have now fixed git to accept both TAB and BS as silent mode switch
>> >> >key. TAB at any time, and BS only if pressed as very first key on the
>> >> >prompt.
>> >
Hi,
I've got a service
[Unit]
Description=lm_sensors for monitoring motherboard sensor values
After=syslog.target
[Service]
EnvironmentFile=/etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors
Type=oneshot
ExecStart=/bin/bash -c "for module in $BUS_MODULES $HWMON_MODULES; do
/sbin/modprobe $module >/dev/null 2>&1; done"
E
On Tue, 29.03.11 19:17, Jan Engelhardt ([email protected]) wrote:
> >> >I have now fixed git to accept both TAB and BS as silent mode switch
> >> >key. TAB at any time, and BS only if pressed as very first key on the
> >> >prompt.
> >> >Everybody happy?
> >>
> >> No. We don't need two keys to p
On Tuesday 2011-03-29 19:06, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>On Tue, 29.03.11 18:56, Jan Engelhardt ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tuesday 2011-03-29 18:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> >
>> >Ah, ok. I see. If BS is handled like this only as very first keypress
>> >(and not later on anymore) t
On Tue, 29.03.11 18:56, Jan Engelhardt ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 2011-03-29 18:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> >Ah, ok. I see. If BS is handled like this only as very first keypress
> >(and not later on anymore) this indeed makes more sense.
> >
> >I have now fixed git to acc
On Tuesday 2011-03-29 18:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
>Ah, ok. I see. If BS is handled like this only as very first keypress
>(and not later on anymore) this indeed makes more sense.
>
>I have now fixed git to accept both TAB and BS as silent mode switch
>key. TAB at any time, and BS only if pre
On Tue, 29.03.11 00:10, Jan Engelhardt ([email protected]) wrote:
> >> Incorporating Graham's suggestion to use BKSP instead:
> >
> >Hmm?
> >
> >Backspace? Why backspace?
>
> Quoting Graham:
>
> "On a slightly different note; Would it be possible to watch for
> unprintable keys? For example, w
On Tue, 29.03.11 03:20, [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote:
> 2011/3/28 Lennart Poettering :
> > On Sun, 20.03.11 05:28, [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote:
> >> Current readahead implementation has some problems:
> >> 1. It can't separate *real* block read requests from all read
On Tue, 29.03.11 03:36, [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> Hi Kay,
>
> 2011/3/28 Kay Sievers :
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 14:57, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >
> > Udev no longer enables udev-settle.service by default now.
> > basic.target is no longer blocked by it, and udev's coldplug
On Sun, 20.03.11 16:50, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote:
> Currently handling of unit aliases (symlinks) is inconsistent
> between systemd and systemctl. While systemd allows acces unit
> under any alias, systemctl will refuse to process them unless
> redirecting request to systemd.
On Sun, 20.03.11 15:03, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> systemd[1]: Installed new job poweroff.target/start as 468
> [...]
> systemd[1]: Installed new job dev-mapper-secrets.device/start as 492
> systemd[1]: Installed new job [email protected]/start as 493
>
> Oops. Wh
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Monday 2011-03-28 23:29, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 27.03.11 23:52, Jan Engelhardt ([email protected]) wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Friday 2011-03-18 01:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Fri, 18.03.11 00:18, Jan Engelh
24 matches
Mail list logo
