On Sun, 20.03.11 16:50, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote: > Currently handling of unit aliases (symlinks) is inconsistent > between systemd and systemctl. While systemd allows acces unit > under any alias, systemctl will refuse to process them unless > redirecting request to systemd.
Hmm, I am a bit concernced about this, as this means that you can "disable" units with a name you cannot "enable" them with again anymore. What is the precise usecase for this? The least I'd like to see changed is that we never follow symlinks here in /etc, only in /lib? Note that "enable" and "start" are asymmetric anyway. The former takes template names, the latter only instance names... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
