On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Adam Spragg wrote:
> On Monday 07 Mar 2011 17:32:33 Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>> wrote:
>> > Seems incomplete, as it doesnt actually include the .vimrc file?
>>
>> I did not intend to force my personal vim style on anyone, just make
>> it sure people can add custom .
On Mon, 07.03.11 22:13, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote:
> > For the latter we generate a warning currently, telling the user that
> > the service has no [Install] section.
> >
> >> Am I missing something? Is there a different command that should be used?
> >> It seems a more full imple
On Mon, 07.03.11 14:55, Bill Nottingham ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> Lennart Poettering ([email protected]) said:
> > > In my head, I was thinking 'targets that are included by default.target'.
> > > So, on a 'normal' install, that would be graphical, multi-user, local-fs,
> > > basic, e
On Mon, 07.03.11 22:11, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 04.03.11 22:37, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote:
> >
> >> I am playing with per-interface auto-generated units (for the case
> >> without
On Monday 07 Mar 2011 17:32:33 Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> wrote:
> > Seems incomplete, as it doesnt actually include the .vimrc file?
>
> I did not intend to force my personal vim style on anyone, just make
> it sure people can add custom .vimrc with whatever settings are deemed
> appropriate.
Th
Heya,
in the past weeks a couple of folks have been asking about the rsyslog
and systemd glue in systemd, and I never responded since this was still
work in progress. Things should be all resolved now, so here's a
heads-up in how things should work now:
I have just sent a patch to rsyslog upstrea
On Mon, 07.03.11 20:12, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> On 07.03.2011 20:00, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >On Mon, 07.03.11 19:23, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected])
> >wrote:
> >
> >>On 07.03.2011 19:04, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >>>Oh, I had assumed tha
Lennart Poettering ([email protected]) said:
> > In my head, I was thinking 'targets that are included by default.target'.
> > So, on a 'normal' install, that would be graphical, multi-user, local-fs,
> > basic, etc.
> >
> > If you wanted a different target, you could say (for example):
> >
Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) said:
> > I am not sure I am such a big fan of reimplementing NetworkManager...
>
> It has nothing to do with reimplementing NM. There is large number of
> possible ifcfg configuration that NM still does not support; nor is NM
> always used and desirable (wh
2011/3/7 Lennart Poettering :
>
> Is something like this available in VI, too?
>
For vim I currently have
{pts/1}% cat .vimrc
set expandtab
C mode is already auto detected on Vim and default indentation rules
seem to match what you use. Of course, it could also be explicitly
added; I could send
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 04.03.11 14:51, Bill Nottingham ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>> The implementation of the is-enabled command makes its not necessarily
>> useful as I might expect it to be. From looking at it, it merely checks
>> whether the '[In
On 07.03.2011 20:00, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 07.03.11 19:23, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote:
On 07.03.2011 19:04, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Oh, I had assumed that .vimrc trick would allow project-wide vim
modelines without having to edit each and every single f
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 04.03.11 22:37, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>> I am playing with per-interface auto-generated units (for the case
>> without NetworkManager :) ) and so far it looks quite promising -
>> using trivial unit file
On Mon, 07.03.11 13:43, Bill Nottingham ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> Lennart Poettering ([email protected]) said:
> > > That means that it's not going to be correct for any service that has
> > > been enabled via other means, or doesn't have an '[Install]' section.
> >
> > For the latte
On Mon, 07.03.11 19:23, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> On 07.03.2011 19:04, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> >Oh, I had assumed that .vimrc trick would allow project-wide vim
> >modelines without having to edit each and every single file.
> >
> >Currently, every file do
On 07.03.2011 19:04, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Oh, I had assumed that .vimrc trick would allow project-wide vim
modelines without having to edit each and every single file.
Currently, every file does contain an emacs modeline at the top. It
would be fair I guess to add a vim modeline to all tho
Lennart Poettering ([email protected]) said:
> > That means that it's not going to be correct for any service that has
> > been enabled via other means, or doesn't have an '[Install]' section.
>
> For the latter we generate a warning currently, telling the user that
> the service has no [Ins
On Mon, 07.03.11 19:04, Lennart Poettering ([email protected]) wrote:
> > >> Well, this is what vim does by default. What about attached patch
> > >> then?
> > >
> > > Seems incomplete, as it doesnt actually include the .vimrc file?
> > >
> >
> > I did not intend to force my personal vim sty
On Mon, 07.03.11 20:32, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 07.03.11 13:56, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Lennart Poettering
> >> wrote:
> >> > Next tim
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 07.03.11 13:56, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > Next time, please do not use tabs!
>> >
>>
>> Well, this is what vim does by default. What about
On Mon, 07.03.11 18:00, Dr. Werner Fink ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 05:21:36PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 07.03.11 17:14, Dr. Werner Fink ([email protected]) wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmmm ... AFAIK RedHat has not left the Linux Foundation, does this
> > > mean th
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 05:21:36PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 07.03.11 17:14, Dr. Werner Fink ([email protected]) wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm ... AFAIK RedHat has not left the Linux Foundation, does this
> > mean that RedHat will ignore the results of the LSB working group?
>
> Fedora has ne
On Mon, 07.03.11 17:14, Dr. Werner Fink ([email protected]) wrote:
> > > It has to be possible to fulfill FHS not only in theory but
> > > in practice. That is that if an network interface has to up
> > > for the NFS share /usr then systemd should support this.
> >
> > The 1000ths time: it has noth
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 17:14, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:50:16PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 16:44, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
>> >
>> > Those customers have payed for support including this feature
>> > and some of them exactly for this feature. I'm
On Mon, 07.03.11 16:44, Dr. Werner Fink ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:18:16PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 16:04, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmmm ... AFAIK we do. If things do not work, then it has to be fixed
> > > as we have users/custo
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:50:16PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 16:44, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
> >
> > Those customers have payed for support including this feature
> > and some of them exactly for this feature. I'm not going to
> > ignore this hard requirement for snugness.
On Mon, 07.03.11 16:04, Dr. Werner Fink ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:09:03PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Fri, 25.02.11 13:35, Adam Spragg ([email protected]) wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Friday 25 Feb 2011 13:00:51 Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > > > Commit
> > > > htt
On Mon, 07.03.11 13:56, Andrey Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > Next time, please do not use tabs!
> >
>
> Well, this is what vim does by default. What about attached patch
> then?
Seems incomplete, as it doesnt actually in
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 16:44, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:18:16PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 16:04, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
>> >
>> > Hmmm ... AFAIK we do. If things do not work, then it has to be fixed
>> > as we have users/customers around defini
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:18:16PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 16:04, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm ... AFAIK we do. If things do not work, then it has to be fixed
> > as we have users/customers around definitely use this feature.
>
> I doubt anybody will be able to
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 16:04, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:09:03PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Fri, 25.02.11 13:35, Adam Spragg ([email protected]) wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > On Friday 25 Feb 2011 13:00:51 Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>> > > Commit
>> > > http://cgit.freedesktop.o
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:09:03PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 25.02.11 13:35, Adam Spragg ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Friday 25 Feb 2011 13:00:51 Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > > Commit
> > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/commit/?id=80758717a6359cbe6048f43a17c
> > > 2b53
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Next time, please do not use tabs!
>
Well, this is what vim does by default. What about attached patch then?
From: Andrey Borzenkov
Subject: [PATCH] add .vimrc to .gitignore
---
.gitignore |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0
33 matches
Mail list logo
