On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:49:11PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > We can ask, but it has been that way for at least a decade so I'm
> > guessing it's unlikely to be changed now. See this Debian bug from
> > 2001, marked wontfix.
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=117596
> I pers
On Thu, 11.11.10 11:01, Kay Sievers ([email protected]) wrote:
> > What's wrong?
>
> It's a bug in the systemd filter list. systemd has a list of stuff to
> ignore, along with the API filesystems it uses itself. The
> remount-api-vfs tool uses the entire list, so this goes wrong with
> /proc/b
On Thu, 11.11.10 14:06, Andreas Jaeger ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> On Thursday 11 November 2010 12:50:44 Kay Sievers wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Anyway, the point of this was only to have getty start late(ish) in
> > > the boot process, after most of the other services that are pulled in
> > > by mul
On Thu, 11.11.10 12:50, Kay Sievers ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Anyway, the point of this was only to have getty start late(ish) in
> > the boot process, after most of the other services that are pulled in
> > by multi-user.target. Maybe there is a better way to specify this, if
> > not ever
On Thu, 11.11.10 21:39, Andrew Edmunds ([email protected]) wrote:
> Kay, Lennart,
>
> Kay Sievers wrote:
> > Michael, any chance to check if it's possible to avoid the mangling of
> > common util-linux tool names, and get a symlink in Debian package?
> > After that we can drop the ifdef
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:30, Andrew Edmunds
wrote:
> man/systemd.exec.xml | 19 ++-
> man/systemd.service.xml | 6 +++---
> man/systemd.unit.xml | 2 +-
> man/systemd.xml | 12 ++--
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Applied.
T
On 11.11.2010 12:39, Andrew Edmunds wrote:
> Kay, Lennart,
>
> Kay Sievers wrote:
>> Michael, any chance to check if it's possible to avoid the mangling of
>> common util-linux tool names, and get a symlink in Debian package?
>> After that we can drop the ifdef stuff here.
>
> We can ask, but it
On Thursday 11 November 2010 12:50:44 Kay Sievers wrote:
> [...]
> > Anyway, the point of this was only to have getty start late(ish) in
> > the boot process, after most of the other services that are pulled in
> > by multi-user.target. Maybe there is a better way to specify this, if
> > not everyo
On 11/11/2010 12:03 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 03.11.10 11:03, Felix Braun ([email protected]) wrote:
Hi there,
heya,
while systemd wasn't chosen as a default init system for F14, it is
included in the repositories. That way, it was argued, more people
could give it a tr
man/systemd.exec.xml| 19 ++-
man/systemd.service.xml |6 +++---
man/systemd.unit.xml|2 +-
man/systemd.xml | 12 ++--
4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/systemd.exec.xml b/man/systemd.exec.xml
index 51dcdcd..7c8
On Thursday 11 November 2010 11:01:21 Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:34, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > I noticed for some time that systemd-remount-api-vfs is in the failed
> > state and found now the following in the log files
> >
> > <4>[3.063357] systemd[1]: systemd 11 running
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:39, Andrew Edmunds
wrote:
> Kay Sievers wrote:
>> Michael, any chance to check if it's possible to avoid the mangling of
>> common util-linux tool names, and get a symlink in Debian package?
>> After that we can drop the ifdef stuff here.
>
> We can ask, but it has been
Kay, Lennart,
Kay Sievers wrote:
> Michael, any chance to check if it's possible to avoid the mangling of
> common util-linux tool names, and get a symlink in Debian package?
> After that we can drop the ifdef stuff here.
We can ask, but it has been that way for at least a decade so I'm
guessing
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 00:37, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 03.11.10 22:49, Andrew Edmunds ([email protected]) wrote:
>> A few points about these two source files.
>>
>> 1. [email protected] has:
>> > m4_ifdef(`TARGET_FEDORA', `m4_define(`GETTY', `/sbin/agetty 38400')')m4_dnl
>>
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:34, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
> I noticed for some time that systemd-remount-api-vfs is in the failed state
> and found now the following in the log files
>
> <4>[ 3.063357] systemd[1]: systemd 11 running in system mode. (+PAM
> +LIBWRAP +AUDIT +SELINUX +SYSVINIT; sus
I noticed for some time that systemd-remount-api-vfs is in the failed state and
found now the following in the log files
<4>[3.063357] systemd[1]: systemd 11 running in system mode. (+PAM +LIBWRAP
+AUDIT +SELINUX +SYSVINIT; suse)
<4>[3.142518] systemd[1]: Set hostname to .
<4>[4.598
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 23:59:26 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 04.11.10 11:30, Andreas Jaeger ([email protected]) wrote:
> > IMO we should add an easy reference of the structure of tmpfiles.d files.
> > Here's a patch,
>
> I'd prefer not to maintain duplicates of the documentation at dif
On Thursday, November 11, 2010, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:52:51 -0200
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 01:02:51PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:33 AM,
18 matches
Mail list logo
