On Thu, 11.11.10 14:06, Andreas Jaeger ([email protected]) wrote: > > On Thursday 11 November 2010 12:50:44 Kay Sievers wrote: > > [...] > > > Anyway, the point of this was only to have getty start late(ish) in > > > the boot process, after most of the other services that are pulled in > > > by multi-user.target. Maybe there is a better way to specify this, if > > > not everyone has rc.local? > > > > Yeah, others asked for that too. So far, we don't really have a > > concept of 'late' or 'last' in systemd. > > Yes, we had this in openSUSE as well the $ALL target to have the firewall > called at the end so that it could handle services with dynamic ports. > For details see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652608
Can't say I like this approach to firewalls. Matching against ports is a thing of the past. They firewall people should match against processes, that's the only remotely sensible thing and then all of this would not be necessary. I am really not a big fan of Suse's $ALL extension. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
