Re: [systemd-devel] Archlinux patch for services and getty

2010-05-19 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 19.05.10 10:00, Michael Meeks ([email protected]) wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 00:27 +0200, Marius O wrote: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/units/arch/halt.service > > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ > > +# This file is part of systemd. > > +# > > +# systemd is free software; you can redistr

Re: [systemd-devel] Archlinux patch for services and getty

2010-05-19 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 19.05.10 00:27, Marius O ([email protected]) wrote: Heya, > Hello, > > I don't know if Arch is considered a well-known distribution, but > here's a patch for adding a base for Arch specific services. Oh, I think it is well-known enough, and in dubio pro reo... > Also, how should we pro

Re: [systemd-devel] Archlinux patch for services and getty

2010-05-19 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:00, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 00:27 +0200, Marius O wrote: >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/units/arch/halt.service >> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ >> +#  This file is part of systemd. >> +# >> +#  systemd is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > >      

Re: [systemd-devel] Archlinux patch for services and getty

2010-05-19 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 00:27 +0200, Marius O wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/units/arch/halt.service > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ > +# This file is part of systemd. > +# > +# systemd is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify I'm a fan of the GPL & headers on code, and all that; but is