Re: [SM-USERS] imapproxy configuration

2003-06-05 Thread Julian Gomez
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 03:15:52PM +0200, Paeddy spoke thusly: (snip lots) >## This setting specifies which port the proxy server will bind to and >## accept incoming connections from. ># >listen_port 143 ># (snip) >## server_port >## >server_port 143 As someone else has already mentioned, the

RE: [SM-USERS] imapproxy configuration

2003-06-05 Thread Seth Randall
Okay, here it is. I know it will run on RedHat 6.2 and should run on the rest of the RedHats. I don't know about other systems. Seth. p dont think said: >> What happens if you just try to run: >> in.imapproxy >> >> I just got this up and running, so I could send you the init.d script > I >> use.

RE: [SM-USERS] imapproxy configuration

2003-06-05 Thread p dont think
> What happens if you just try to run: > in.imapproxy > > I just got this up and running, so I could send you the init.d script I > use.The one that it ships with kinda sucks. As it was pointed out, this is a bit OT, but Seth, just for the sake of people searching the mailing list archives, w

Re: [SM-USERS] imapproxy configuration

2003-06-05 Thread Linux Doctor
I had no problem running the imapproxy configuration under the same setup as yours (RH 9). You need to start the service using (as root) "service imapproxy start". Yes, their scripts are sparse, but I installed them and they worked. Try "ps aux | grep imapproxy" afterwards to see if your in.imap

Re: [SM-USERS] imapproxy configuration

2003-06-05 Thread William Hooper
A question better asked on the imapproxy list: http://lists.pitt.edu/mailman/listinfo/imapproxy-info Paeddy said: [snip] > i can start it using the /etc/rc2.d/S99imapproxy start but afterwords i > cant > find a process (doing a ps -ef | grep imap). [snip] > ps: attached my config file, probably i

Re: [SM-USERS] imapproxy configuration

2003-06-05 Thread Seth Randall
What happens if you just try to run: in.imapproxy I just got this up and running, so I could send you the init.d script I use.The one that it ships with kinda sucks. Seth. Paeddy said: > Hi all, > > since i also updated ot version 1.4.1 of squirrelmail i got some users > complaiing about the