> >>> ==> SquirrelMail (SM) patch forum <==
>
> > Personally I'd also rather use official code, and I'm sure a lot of
> > other users feel the same. New users might get confused by references to
> > other sites, and might not know what it entails to "risk" using
> > third-party pa
Johannes Egger wrote:
>>> ==> SquirrelMail (SM) patch forum <==
> Personally I'd also rather use official code, and I'm sure a lot of
> other users feel the same. New users might get confused by references to
> other sites, and might not know what it entails to "risk" using
> th
==> SquirrelMail (SM) patch forum <==
Hrm... Asking the admins if you could spam the list with this might
have been a good idea. This comes across as being something official
from the SM team, which it is not, and not supported by us at all.
... I know this is probably O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi jam,
On Monday, March 13, 2006, jam wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm pleased to announce the release of
>==> SquirrelMail (SM) patch forum <==
Hrm... Asking the admins if you could spam the list with this might
have been a good idea. T
