> >>> ==> SquirrelMail (SM) patch forum <== > > > Personally I'd also rather use official code, and I'm sure a lot of > > other users feel the same. New users might get confused by references to > > other sites, and might not know what it entails to "risk" using > > third-party patches that may or may not do what they intend. > > > > I'd rather wait for the author of the plugin to commit changes > > I agree with you. I'd rather participate in the established groups, and > with authors, to provide ideas and suggest changes. I'd rather use the > established system so that new versions are distributed via the official > site. This provides better opportunity for changes to be well tested and > any glitches to be reported, discussed and remedied. > > I have no interest in some unofficial forum with quick hacks that aren't > well tested, and possibly written by authors who can't be bothered to > follow SM guidelines.
While I ultimately agree with you guys, let's not be too harsh. Jam has been really active around SM lately and has put out a lot of functional code, even if it isn't immediately adopted. I think the proliferation of non-official SM-related sites should be seen as a tribute to SM's popularity and should be taken as high praise. -paul ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
