Re: [SM-USERS] Large Mailbox issues (Sendmail)

2003-06-11 Thread Brett Nemeroff
Hi There, I've written to the list several times regarding this issue.. Search for something like UW IMAP slow performace,etc.. The problem is that UW-IMAP by default uses mbox format which is one big file for all messages. To count messages or to even find out how many are new/old, it has to open

Re: [SM-USERS] Large Mailbox issues (Sendmail)

2003-06-11 Thread William R. Mussatto
> William Mussatto wrote: >> I'm not sure why sendmail would be the issue. Its more likely the >> program which handles IMAP (e.g., uw-imapd, courier) that is the >> issue. In the case of uw-imapd with the standard 'mailbox' set up, >> the imapd program must read and parse the entire file which c

Re: [SM-USERS] Large Mailbox issues (Sendmail)

2003-06-11 Thread Chris Hilts
> But, from what you say, is there an alternative to imapd that will not > read the entire mailbox to find the last 15? You are probably using the "mbox" format to store your mail. This puts all the messages for a folder into one file. So, to get the last 15 messages, it has to read in the entir

Re: [SM-USERS] Large Mailbox issues (Sendmail)

2003-06-10 Thread Somik Raha
Scott Carr wrote: > Just to through this out. I ran into this type of problem as well. It > turned out to be squirrelmail filters that I had setup. I turned them > off, and things go alot faster. I am not using Squirrelmail filters - only server-side filters (procmail). Regards, Somik --

Re: [SM-USERS] Large Mailbox issues (Sendmail)

2003-06-10 Thread Somik Raha
William Mussatto wrote: > I'm not sure why sendmail would be the issue. Its more likely the program > which handles IMAP (e.g., uw-imapd, courier) that is the issue. In the > case of uw-imapd with the standard 'mailbox' set up, the imapd program > must read and parse the entire file which contain

Re: [SM-USERS] Large Mailbox issues (Sendmail)

2003-06-10 Thread Scott Carr
>> Hi, >> After scanning "large mailbox" messages on this list, I've not been >> really clear about why it should happen with Sendmail.. Hence the >> question - we always manage to get thru large mailboxes but only >> after several minutes! There are only 4 users of the system - so I >> don't t

Re: [SM-USERS] Large Mailbox issues (Sendmail)

2003-06-10 Thread William R. Mussatto
> Hi, > After scanning "large mailbox" messages on this list, I've not been > really clear about why it should happen with Sendmail.. Hence the > question - we always manage to get thru large mailboxes but only > after several minutes! There are only 4 users of the system - so I > don't think s