Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem solved

2005-02-03 Thread Arthur Stephens
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:52 AM Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem > Ok you say upgrade to PHP I have done a rpm -q PHP and turned up nothing. > So I tried rpm -q mod_PHP turned up nothing. So does this mean PHP is > missing? > How do I find it? > > --

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem

2005-02-02 Thread Arthur Stephens
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 2:17 PM Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem > > I am accessing with regular http > > Here is the properties of the page where I got the action cancelled. > > > > res://C:\WINNT\system32\shdoclc.dl

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem

2005-02-01 Thread Jonathan Angliss
> I am accessing with regular http > Here is the properties of the page where I got the action cancelled. > > res://C:\WINNT\system32\shdoclc.dll/navcancl.htm#https://www.ptera.net:80/we > bmail/src/right_main.php?mailbox=INBOX&sort=0&startMessage=1 Tada ;) Notice the https:// bit, and then the p

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem

2005-02-01 Thread Arthur Stephens
athan Angliss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "p dont think" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Arthur Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "smu" Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 12:33 PM Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem > >>>>[Wed Ja

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem

2005-02-01 Thread p dont think
Jonathan Angliss wrote: [Wed Jan 26 09:33:25 2005] [error] [client 69.28.32.138] Invalid method in request \x80L\x01\x03 [Wed Jan 26 09:33:25 2005] [error] [client 69.28.32.138] Invalid method in request \x80L\x01\x03 The other server I have (same os) which I have not upgraded does not do this. I

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem

2005-02-01 Thread Jonathan Angliss
[Wed Jan 26 09:33:25 2005] [error] [client 69.28.32.138] Invalid method in request \x80L\x01\x03 [Wed Jan 26 09:33:25 2005] [error] [client 69.28.32.138] Invalid method in request \x80L\x01\x03 The other server I have (same os) which I have not upgraded does not do this. >>>

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem

2005-02-01 Thread p dont think
Please reply to the list, not me. Also, please do not top-post. Thanks, I recently upgraded squirrelmail using yum to version 1.4.3a-6.FC3 Sometimes when signing in they get the Folders View in both frames. And when customers send emails instead of returning to their INBOX they get Action cancel

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem

2005-02-01 Thread p dont think
I recently upgraded squirrelmail using yum to version 1.4.3a-6.FC3 Sometimes when signing in they get the Folders View in both frames. And when customers send emails instead of returning to their INBOX they get Action canceled Internet Explorer was unable to link to the Web page you requested.

[SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem

2005-01-31 Thread Arthur Stephens
I recently upgraded squirrelmail using yum to version 1.4.3a-6.FC3 Sometimes when signing in they get the Folders View in both frames. And when customers send emails instead of returning to their INBOX they get  Action canceled Internet Explorer was unable