[SM-USERS] Proon - sorted

2009-11-19 Thread Nigel Kendrick
Gotta turn on 'unseen too', I see! All working, thanks. -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what

[SM-USERS] Proon - messages still present after deleting

2009-11-19 Thread Nigel Kendrick
Hi, I've just installed the 'proon' pruning tool under SM 1.4.13. I've 112 very old messages in trash in a test mailbox. Proon says it will delete them, but they're still there after a manual prune. Some kind of permissions issue? Any hints.

Re: [SM-USERS] Cannot see address book after server migration - SORTED

2008-06-13 Thread Nigel Kendrick
Happily sorted - after some searching I found some address books were in /usr/share/squirrelmail/data and some in /var/lib/squirrelmail/prefs (?) I've sync'd the files in these folders and checked which set were actually being updated. ---

[SM-USERS] Cannot see address book after server migration

2008-06-12 Thread Nigel Kendrick
Hi, I have moved our squirrelmail installation to a new server after a system failure and migrated all users/data etc. Users have noticed that their address books are empty so I have had a look: 1) All abook files are in /usr/share/squirrelmail/data 2) I moved a user's abook file out of the

[SM-USERS] Change_Passwd with 1.4.8 - works OK?

2006-08-24 Thread Nigel Kendrick
reinstalled it following the instructions carefully and also compared the install to other sites (all running CentOS4, PHP 4.3.9). Is it me? What startling obvious thing might I have missed!? Can't see any errors in the logs Thanks Nigel Ken

RE: [SM-USERS] Upgrade 1.45 -> 1.46. Lost address books - SORTED

2006-03-01 Thread Nigel kendrick
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Hilts Sent: 28 February 2006 15:07 To: Nigel kendrick Cc: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Upgrade 1.45 -> 1.46. Lost address books - SORTED -BEGIN PGP SIG

[SM-USERS] Upgrade 1.45 -> 1.46. Lost address books - SORTED

2006-02-28 Thread Nigel kendrick
Sorta found my own answer - the new install expects the address books to be in /usr/share/squirrelmail/data Hmmm! NK -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel kendrick Sent: 28 February 2006 08:48 To: squirrelmail-users

[SM-USERS] Upgrade 1.45 -> 1.46. Lost address books

2006-02-28 Thread Nigel kendrick
After the upgrade everyone has lost their address books. I have found them in /var/lib/squirrelmail/prefs but do they need to be elsewhere now!!?? Thanks (Apologies of this is a double post - I got an error after sending the first one) ---

RE: [SM-USERS] Cannot login if using https - FOLLOW UP

2005-06-29 Thread Nigel kendrick
OK, here's the inconclusive follow-up: I checked for significant stuff in the relevant logs - nothing I removed all plugins - no change Regular http logins started to fail too!!! AARGH I installed the latest version of SM to replaced the base version supplied with CentOS - no change I put the

RE: [SM-USERS] Cannot login if using https

2005-06-29 Thread Nigel kendrick
Thanks for all the replies so far. I am doing some checking based on the suggestions and will post back. One thing I've found in the http logs which might be related is the following - mind you this message has only appeared once while doing some late night testing so it may be spurious??? [Wed J

[SM-USERS] Cannot login if using https

2005-06-28 Thread Nigel kendrick
d IP addresses and I know that the IP resolution (ie: whatismyip.com) from this site tends to return the ISP's gateway address for our site rather than the actual IP address of the server - could this be causing problems or am I way out on this? Any suggestions or debugging hints would b

Re: [SM-USERS] Receive is fine but no send - PROBLEM IDENTIFIED

2005-05-22 Thread Nigel Kendrick
> Hello Nigel Kendrick, > On Friday, May 20, 2005, you wrote: > >> Just to follow up on my previous post - this looks like an SELinux >> security >> issue as I spotted the following log messages (/var/log/messages): > >> May 20 11:02:54 petdoctors kernel: a

[SM-USERS] Receive is fine but no send - PROBLEM IDENTIFIED

2005-05-20 Thread Nigel Kendrick
Just to follow up on my previous post - this looks like an SELinux security issue as I spotted the following log messages (/var/log/messages): May 20 11:02:54 petdoctors kernel: audit(1116583374.225:0): avc: denied { create } for pid=4039 exe=/usr/sbin/sendmail.pos tfix scontext=user_u:system_r

[SM-USERS] Receive is fine but no send

2005-05-20 Thread Nigel Kendrick
done a bit of Googling on Squirrelmail troubleshooting without much success so any debugging pointers would be appreciated. Thanks Nigel Kendrick --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software de