>> If you use SquirrelMail 1.4.4 and turned off email modifications in
>> SquirrelMail configuration, you haven't disabled it.
>
> Why do you keep saying that? I've turned it off, and if I go into
> the settings... I definitely can not change the setting... how do you
> propose someone would chan
David Guntner wrote:
> Marc Powell grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>>> Of David Guntner
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 1:45 PM
>>> To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> Subject
David Guntner wrote:
> [Attribute lines are nice - helps people to know who said what :)]
Yeah sorry, I accidentally deleted it!
Dave
--
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[Attribute lines are nice - helps people to know who said what :)]
dave nash grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
>>> Not so. I run Thunderbird 2.0.0.6, and a simple "reply" goes to the
>>> poster's e-mail address, not back to the list.
>>
>> Check yo
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Bill Landry wrote:
> However, replying to the "To:" header is certainly not the default behavior
> for
> many e-mail clients. Mailman can be set to add a "Reply-To" header, so maybe
> there was some reason why the Squirrel Mail list admin opted not to set
> this???
Pine rep
> >
> > Not so. I run Thunderbird 2.0.0.6, and a simple "reply" goes to the
> > poster's e-mail address, not back to the list.
>
> Check your settings, then. I use Claws, and hitting "reply" goes back
> to the mailing list just fine.
>
> Although, upon inspecting the message headers, I sure d
On 9/6/07, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not doubting that what Paul is suggesting, I'm trying to
> understand a little better.
>
> Also, just as an FYI, Paul when someone top posts or bottom posts
> or does anything else that isn't set in stone or law... it's probably
> better to just
I'm not doubting that what Paul is suggesting, I'm trying to
understand a little better.
Also, just as an FYI, Paul when someone top posts or bottom posts
or does anything else that isn't set in stone or law... it's probably
better to just let it go rather than go off about it. That has the
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Matt
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 3:06 PM
> Cc: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Spam Sent From WebMail
>
> > If you use SquirrelMail 1.4.4 and turned off e
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Matt
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 3:10 PM
> Cc: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Spam Sent From WebMail
>
> > or turn off login_auto functionality and block
Removing thread context is not helpful.
> > or turn off login_auto functionality and block all requests to
> > src/mailto.php.
>
> src/mailto.php doesn't exist.
>
> However, again we are chasing the straw man (is that the right term to
> use here?). I'm being told to upgrade because of security,
> or turn off login_auto functionality and block all requests to
> src/mailto.php.
src/mailto.php doesn't exist.
However, again we are chasing the straw man (is that the right term to
use here?). I'm being told to upgrade because of security, etc,
etc yet that's not the issue.. the issue i
> "not upgraded due to various themes". If you haven't modified SquirrelMail
> scripts, upgrade path is simple. You just have to fix login page and
> reapply msg flags patches.
I'll try.. but I'm pretty sure our theme breaks when we try to
upgrade.. I know it definitely broke when we tried it on o
> If you use SquirrelMail 1.4.4 and turned off email modifications in
> SquirrelMail configuration, you haven't disabled it.
Why do you keep saying that? I've turned it off, and if I go into
the settings... I definitely can not change the setting... how do you
propose someone would change it?
-
Bill Landry grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> David Guntner wrote:
> > Bill Landry grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> >
> > Check your settings, then. I use Claws, and hitting "reply" goes
> > back to the mailing list just fine.
> >
> > Although, upon inspecting the message headers, I sure don't *
Marc Powell grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> > Of David Guntner
> > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 1:45 PM
> > To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [SM-USERS] Replying to li
> >> Please provide more information about your setup.
> >> 1. SquirrelMail version
> >
> > 1.4.4 (have not upgraded due to various themes, etc we have installed)
>
> please upgrade. http://www.squirrelmail.org/security/.
>
> or turn off login_auto functionality and block all requests to
> src/mail
David Guntner wrote:
> Bill Landry grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> Check your settings, then. I use Claws, and hitting "reply" goes back
> to the mailing list just fine.
>
> Although, upon inspecting the message headers, I sure don't *see* a
> Reply-To: header in there (maybe I'm just missing
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> David Guntner
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 1:45 PM
> To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [SM-USERS] Replying to list (was Re: Spam Sent From WebMail)
>
> Bill Landry grab
>> Please provide more information about your setup.
>> 1. SquirrelMail version
>
> 1.4.4 (have not upgraded due to various themes, etc we have installed)
please upgrade. http://www.squirrelmail.org/security/.
or turn off login_auto functionality and block all requests to
src/mailto.php.
>
>> 2.
Bill Landry grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> Freddie Cash wrote:
> > On September 6, 2007 06:45 am John Hinton wrote:
> >> Matt wrote:
> >>> Thomas,
> >>> Sorry about sending that directly to you. The SM mailing list is
> >>> the only one I have to hit 'reply all' and then remove the TO:
> >>>
Freddie Cash wrote:
> On September 6, 2007 06:45 am John Hinton wrote:
>> Matt wrote:
>>> Thomas,
>>> Sorry about sending that directly to you. The SM mailing list is
>>> the only one I have to hit 'reply all' and then remove the TO: from
>>> to get it to go correctly. All other mailing lits I'
On September 6, 2007 06:45 am John Hinton wrote:
> Matt wrote:
> > Thomas,
> > Sorry about sending that directly to you. The SM mailing list is
> > the only one I have to hit 'reply all' and then remove the TO: from
> > to get it to go correctly. All other mailing lits I'm a member of,
> > if I
Matt wrote:
> Thomas,
> Sorry about sending that directly to you. The SM mailing list is the
> only one I have to hit 'reply all' and then remove the TO: from to get
> it to go correctly. All other mailing lits I'm a member of, if I hit
> 'reply' it will go back to the list, not the person who
Thomas,
Sorry about sending that directly to you. The SM mailing list is the
only one I have to hit 'reply all' and then remove the TO: from to get
it to go correctly. All other mailing lits I'm a member of, if I hit
'reply' it will go back to the list, not the person who sent the
message... an
25 matches
Mail list logo
