On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Bill Landry wrote:

> However, replying to the "To:" header is certainly not the default behavior 
> for
> many e-mail clients.  Mailman can be set to add a "Reply-To" header, so maybe
> there was some reason why the Squirrel Mail list admin opted not to set 
> this???

Pine replies to user as well...

Just about every mailing list software can have to reply-to set (and is 
the norm to use).

I agree its not a good configuration for lists to reply to "user".
List traffic should stay list traffic and many are annoyed when they
get private replies, through most likely no fault of their own.

Paul? Can you change this?


-- 

Cheers
Res


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Reply via email to