Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 doesn't access some folders (apache 1.3.33 via SSL, Courier IMAP 3.0.8)

2005-02-01 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
> Hi all, > I've just installed squirrelmail 1.4.4 (debian package). It's accessed > through apache 1.3.33 via HTTPS. Everything works wonderfully, but some > folders can't be accessed (they are quite big: ~3k - 30k messages each). > When I click on one of these folders on the folder menu on the le

Re: [SM-USERS] Vacation Testers Needed

2005-02-01 Thread p dont think
>> A security flaw has been identified in the (local) vacation plugin >>(currently version 0.15, >>http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=51), not to mention the >>fact that it is sorely out of date and contains some very dirty code. I >>am currently working through a thorough

[SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 doesn't access some folders (apache 1.3.33 via SSL, Courier IMAP 3.0.8)

2005-02-01 Thread Marco Pantaleoni
Hi all, I've just installed squirrelmail 1.4.4 (debian package). It's accessed through apache 1.3.33 via HTTPS. Everything works wonderfully, but some folders can't be accessed (they are quite big: ~3k - 30k messages each). When I click on one of these folders on the folder menu on the left, the

Re: [SM-USERS] server-side sorting

2005-02-01 Thread Don Russell
p dont think wrote: That particular plugin will sort the mail when you log in. One of the "that particular..."?? He didn't even mention a plugin name. More importantly, please don't confuse people here: there is in fact a plugin called "Server Side Filter" that will allow you to manage procmail

[SM-USERS] Global Folder Creation

2005-02-01 Thread michael
Howdy, I've just got a quick and most likly very easy question, i'm looking at forwarding all mail marked as Spam to a IMAP Folder. What i need to figure out is how to setup SM configuration to create a Spam folder by Default when a user account is created. Regards, Michael --

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem

2005-02-01 Thread Jonathan Angliss
> I am accessing with regular http > Here is the properties of the page where I got the action cancelled. > > res://C:\WINNT\system32\shdoclc.dll/navcancl.htm#https://www.ptera.net:80/we > bmail/src/right_main.php?mailbox=INBOX&sort=0&startMessage=1 Tada ;) Notice the https:// bit, and then the p

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem

2005-02-01 Thread Arthur Stephens
I am accessing with regular http Here is the properties of the page where I got the action cancelled. res://C:\WINNT\system32\shdoclc.dll/navcancl.htm#https://www.ptera.net:80/we bmail/src/right_main.php?mailbox=INBOX&sort=0&startMessage=1 - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Angliss" <[

Re: [SM-USERS] What is squirrelmail-i18n-1.4.4-1 & PHP Question

2005-02-01 Thread Ean Kingston
> Thank you! Is there information about this i18n version that I can view > online? Like what languages it supports. And exactly what this means in > relation to the Squirrelmail interface? You are welcome. I suggest you start reading about it on the squirellmail website (listed at the bottom o

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem

2005-02-01 Thread p dont think
Jonathan Angliss wrote: [Wed Jan 26 09:33:25 2005] [error] [client 69.28.32.138] Invalid method in request \x80L\x01\x03 [Wed Jan 26 09:33:25 2005] [error] [client 69.28.32.138] Invalid method in request \x80L\x01\x03 The other server I have (same os) which I have not upgraded does not do this. I

Re: [SM-USERS] Warning messages

2005-02-01 Thread Scott Saunders
On Feb 1, 2005, at 6:04 AM, p dont think wrote: You only need to post your message once, thanks. Sorry about that. The second message to arrive was actually sent a couple of hours earlier than the other. I assumed it was blocked because it was sent from an account other than the one I signed up

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem

2005-02-01 Thread Jonathan Angliss
[Wed Jan 26 09:33:25 2005] [error] [client 69.28.32.138] Invalid method in request \x80L\x01\x03 [Wed Jan 26 09:33:25 2005] [error] [client 69.28.32.138] Invalid method in request \x80L\x01\x03 The other server I have (same os) which I have not upgraded does not do this. >>>

Re: [SM-USERS] What is squirrelmail-i18n-1.4.4-1 & PHP Question

2005-02-01 Thread Joel Zucker
Thank you! Is there information about this i18n version that I can view online? Like what languages it supports. And exactly what this means in relation to the Squirrelmail interface? Also, are there any caveats I should be aware of if I decide to go with the i18n version of the RPM if my previo

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem

2005-02-01 Thread p dont think
Please reply to the list, not me. Also, please do not top-post. Thanks, I recently upgraded squirrelmail using yum to version 1.4.3a-6.FC3 Sometimes when signing in they get the Folders View in both frames. And when customers send emails instead of returning to their INBOX they get Action cancel

Re: [SM-USERS] v1.4.4: NFS, Preferences being wiped out

2005-02-01 Thread p dont think
Well, then you solve the problem. It's not as easy as you think. Just ask Jonathan. ;) It's not a matter of PHP "just handling it" for you. The browser is too dumb to know that each window/tab you have open should be using a different session cookie. The problem has been known for a couple ye

Re: [SM-USERS] v1.4.4: NFS, Preferences being wiped out

2005-02-01 Thread Jonathan Angliss
>> Well, then you solve the problem. It's not as easy as you think. Just >> ask Jonathan. ;) It's not a matter of PHP "just handling it" for you. >> The browser is too dumb to know that each window/tab you have open >> should be using a different session cookie. The problem has been known >> f

Re: [SM-USERS] SM 1.4.4 undefined setpref() or getpref()

2005-02-01 Thread Ben Holt
p dont think wrote: Trying to move from 1.4.2 to 1.4.4 the following plugins have problems with either setpref() or getpref() being undefined - seems an include_once or require_once of functions/prefs.php is missing or they are no longer compatible. show_user_and_ip 2.2.3 timeout_user

Re: [SM-USERS] What is squirrelmail-i18n-1.4.4-1 & PHP Question

2005-02-01 Thread Ean Kingston
> A quick question. I'm about to upgrade to 1.4.4 from 1.4.3a. I plan to > use the RPMs. But when I went to download there were two versions of the > 1.4.4 RPM: > > squirrelmail-1.4.4-1.noarch.rpm > and > squirrelmail-i18n-1.4.4-1.noarch.rpm > > Can someone tell me what the difference, besides t

[SM-USERS] What is squirrelmail-i18n-1.4.4-1 & PHP Question

2005-02-01 Thread Joel Zucker
A quick question. I'm about to upgrade to 1.4.4 from 1.4.3a. I plan to use the RPMs. But when I went to download there were two versions of the 1.4.4 RPM: squirrelmail-1.4.4-1.noarch.rpm and squirrelmail-i18n-1.4.4-1.noarch.rpm Can someone tell me what the difference, besides the 3MB, between t

Re: [SM-USERS] First installation: /webmail link problem

2005-02-01 Thread Jonathan Angliss
> > CentOS 3.4 (think RHEL 3), with Apache 2.0.52, SquirrelMail 1.4.4, PHP > 4.3.10 compiled from source using qmailrocks.org instructions. > > All seems to work except that I have to enter "http:///webmail/" > (with a trailing slash) into the browser's address bar to get the > SquirrelMail login s

Re: [SM-USERS] v1.4.4: NFS, Preferences being wiped out

2005-02-01 Thread John Madden
> Well, then you solve the problem. It's not as easy as you think. Just > ask Jonathan. ;) It's not a matter of PHP "just handling it" for you. > The browser is too dumb to know that each window/tab you have open > should be using a different session cookie. The problem has been known > for

Re: [SM-USERS] v1.4.4: NFS, Preferences being wiped out

2005-02-01 Thread p dont think
John Madden wrote: One other possibility is that you had more than one SM session open at once in the same browser (to two or more different users); SM does not yet support such use of the software. Well of course, this happens ALL the time eh? -- load-balanced web servers tend to do that. With

Re: [SM-USERS] v1.4.4: NFS, Preferences being wiped out

2005-02-01 Thread John Madden
> One other possibility is that you had more than one SM session open at > once in the same browser (to two or more different users); SM does not > yet support such use of the software. Well of course, this happens ALL the time -- load-balanced web servers tend to do that. With three browser fram

Re: [SM-USERS] v1.4.4: NFS, Preferences being wiped out

2005-02-01 Thread p dont think
I upgraded to v1.4.4 last night and while I'm quite impressed with its performance improvements over previous versions (last used v1.2.8), I've had one shockingly bad thing happen *twice* today: While working in the application, my pref's file has been wiped out. Emptied. Lost. To explain our set

Re: [SM-USERS] Warnings PHP Line 152 & 153

2005-02-01 Thread p dont think
Below is a complete copy of the error messages I receive whenever I try to access my webmail using Squirrel Mail. Can you please reply to me at this email address & let me know what these error messages mean exactly & what I have to do in order to fix them so that I can access my emails again.

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors after upgrade problem

2005-02-01 Thread p dont think
I recently upgraded squirrelmail using yum to version 1.4.3a-6.FC3 Sometimes when signing in they get the Folders View in both frames. And when customers send emails instead of returning to their INBOX they get Action canceled Internet Explorer was unable to link to the Web page you requested.

Re: [SM-USERS] pgp plugin and php 4.3.10 (was changing the location of squirrelail)

2005-02-01 Thread p dont think
I change my question: is gpg plugin is supporting php version 4.3.10: it seems that this version of php does not accept global definition variable. I can't recover. I tried this kind of solulution: adding to /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf: php_admin_value register_globals 1 change the following in /et

Re: [SM-USERS] Warning messages

2005-02-01 Thread p dont think
You only need to post your message once, thanks. We've been using SquirrelMail at work for a couple of years now with no issues. A couple of weeks ago I started getting complaints about weird warning messages showing up in the left hand mailbox list or on the right above the message list. Your r

Re: [SM-USERS] Vacation Testers Needed

2005-02-01 Thread Barry Wong
p dont think wrote: >All, > > A security flaw has been identified in the (local) vacation plugin >(currently version 0.15, >http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=51), not to mention the >fact that it is sorely out of date and contains some very dirty code. I >am

[SM-USERS] PHP errors viewing attached emails

2005-02-01 Thread David Rees
First off, this appears to be a problem that others have experienced before: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3384077&forum_id=2995 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.devel/5217 But no solutions posted in any threads I found besides "check the SM requirements".

[SM-USERS] First installation: /webmail link problem

2005-02-01 Thread rws
CentOS 3.4 (think RHEL 3), with Apache 2.0.52, SquirrelMail 1.4.4, PHP 4.3.10 compiled from source using qmailrocks.org instructions. All seems to work except that I have to enter "http:///webmail/" (with a trailing slash) into the browser's address bar to get the SquirrelMail login screen to app